Power to attach the bank account must therefore be exercised only in strict compliance with the statutory power, and could not be extended to cover situations which were not expressly contemplated by the section. Absent the statutory precondition for exercise of the power of attachment, any order under Section 83 was wholly illegal and unsustainable.
Unabsorbed depreciation pertaining to the assessment year 1997-98 to 2001-02 can be carry forward and adjusted after the lapse of eight assessment years in view of the section 32(2) as amended by the Finance Act, 2001.
1. An Invoice Furnishing Facility (IFF) facility has been provided to taxpayers under QRMP Scheme (Quarterly filers of Form GSTR-1 and also of Form GSTR-3B returns), as per sub-rule (2) of Rule-59 of the CGST Rules, 2017. Taxpayers who have opted for quarterly filing frequency under the scheme can file their details of outward supplies […]
Commissioner Of Customs Vs Motorola India Limited (Karnataka High Court) The tribunal on the basis of advance licences issued to the respondent and the standard input output norms has recorded a finding that the respondent was allowed to import 2% in excess to provide for the wastage. It is also pertinent to mention here that […]
V. Gopalan Vs CCIT (Kerala High Court) The appellant admittedly took voluntary retirement in the year 2001. He had also claimed deduction under Section 10 (10C) (viii) and relief under Section 89 (1) of the Income Tax Act while filing his return of income for the relevant assessment year. The claim came to be rejected […]
JCIT (OSD) Vs Rohan and Rajdeep Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) Assessee incurred expenditure in constructing Amritsar Bus Terminal on BOT basis and to recoup the said investment, the assessee was allowed to collect add a fees from the users of the said bus terminal. In our view, the said right is business or commercial […]
Kirti & Anr. Etc. Vs Oriental Insurance Company Ltd (Supreme Court of India) A very important issue recently came up before the Apex Court wherein the Court settled the controversy as to whether concession made by any counsel would bind the litigating party. The Apex Court in the case of Kirti vs. Oriental Insurance Company […]
Due to the various ground realties the corporates have not been able to take benefit of the scheme. Therefore in these difficult times the extension of CFSS, 2020 is imperative and paying such hefty penalties & fines will not be in best interest of all stakeholders. Thus we request your good office to extend the CFSS, 2020 and other related relaxations till 31.03.2020 in the interest of all stakeholders.
It is hereby clarified that under the provisions of Chartered Accountants Act,1949 it is not permissible to members to share client information with the CRAs, except if permitted by the Auditee client.
Kailash Chandra Bisoyi Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) The main issue involved in such matters is that the difficulty faced by the contractors due to change in the regime regarding works contract under GST. The grievance of the petitioner is that in view of the introduction of the GST, petitioner is required to […]
