In re Gowri Infra Engineering Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) a) Whether the activity undertaken by the applicant is covered under section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2018 read with point 6 Schedule II of the CGST Act, 2017 read with the Karnataka GST Act, 2017 and the IGST Act, 2017? The applicant is constructing […]
In re Carnation Hotels Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Whether accommodation service proposed to be rendered by the applicant to SEZ units are liable to CGST and SGST or IGST? The accommodation service proposed to be rendered by the applicant to SEZ units are covered under the IGST as it is an inter-State supply […]
In re Sukee Printpack LLP (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. In the case where applicant is supplying the paper and paper board printed with content supplied by the recipient of the goods made using physical inputs including paper belonging to the recipient and – a. If the final printed material is a book or a journal […]
In re Manipal Technologies Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Pattadar Passbook cum Title Deed is a ‘Document of Title’ so as to classify under HSN 4907 or as a ‘Passbook’ under HSN 4820. Section 3 of Telangana State Rights in Land Pattadar Passbooks Act – 1971, provides that a record of rights shall be created. […]
NICSI invites online bids against Open tender no NICSI/ INTERNAL AUDITOR /2019/06 for Proposal for Hiring of CA firm for empanelment as Internal Auditor. Tender Document is available on https://etenders.gov.in/eprocure/app
It has been decided to expand the scope and coverage of BBPS to include all categories of billers who raise recurring bills (except prepaid recharges) as eligible participants, on a voluntary basis.
Reserve Bank of India Draft Guidelines for ‘on tap’ Licensing of Small Finance Banks in the Private Sector September 13, 2019 I. Introduction The Reserve Bank had issued the Guidelines for Licensing of ‘Small Finance Banks‘ in the Private Sector on November 27, 2014. The process of licensing culminated in granting in-principle approval to ten […]
The sale of goods was not a high sea sales which was affected after clearing from the Customs. Otherwise, NTPC, the buyer would have filed the Bill of Entry and cleared the goods. The mere fact that the bids for import were finalised by the respondent (MMTC) after approval of NTPC, would not change the nature of transaction.
In re M/s. Santhos Distributors (GST AAR Kerala) It is established from the statement of the applicant that the prices of the products supplied by the applicant is determined by the supplier /principal company and the applicant has no control on the price of the products. Therefore, it is evident that the additional discount given […]
In re M/s. CGR Gold Trading (GST AAR Kerala) i) The tax liability of the applicant; the rate of tax for the services rendered by the applicant on quality testing and certification of gold ornaments. The quality testing and certification of gold ornaments are covered under Service Classification Code, 998346 – Technical testing and analysis […]
