The appellant is aggrieved by the order dated 16/08/2017 of Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise, New Delhi. The appellant is managing hotels and restaurants. They were providing rooms for rent and also various food items, cakes, pastries, cookies, confectionary to the customers in their restaurants.
Important changes in ITR forms for AY 2018-19: Know the details before filing your income tax returns.
Reasons recorded by AO to reopen assessment merely on basis of information from DIT(Inv.) without independently applying his own mind could not be said to be reason to believe that income had escaped assessment hence, reopening was bad in law.
Anti-profiteering is likely to be an area where policy and practice will continue to develop but in the interim it important to develop and implement a plan to comply with the law. As some of these clarifications may emerge in due course, industry may also think of taking advance ruling on critical issues.
One these reasonings, in the absence of any material change justifying the Revenue to take a different view of the matter— and, if there was no change, it was in support of the assessee— we do not think the question should have been reopened and contrary to what had been decided by the CIT in the earlier proceedings, a different and contradictory stand should have been taken
MCA amends Schedule I related to Memorandum of Association (MOA) & Article of Association (AOA). It amends Table F which is Articles Of Association Of A Company Limited By Shares and Table H which is Articles Of Association Of A Company Limited By Guarantee And Not Having Share Capital.
Every certificate shall specify the shares to which it relates and the amount paid-up thereon and shall be signed by two directors or by a director and the company secretary, wherever the company has appointed company secretary:
Where AO had imposed penalty under section 271(1)(c) on account of change of head of income in assessment, it was held that mere making a claim which was not acceptable to revenue, could not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income to attract penalty proceedings.
In the case of Reliance Communications Ltd, Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) laid down certain guidelines for taxation of royalty payments to non-residents and held that payment for acquiring the copy of the software for the copyrighted article cannot be considered as royalty.
Many doubts have been raised by the field formations as there is no clarity as to how the said procedure is to be dealt with. Therefore, the undersigned has discussed the issue with the Joint Secretary (Customs) and it has been informed that the exporters based in Gujarat only can approach the CGST officers deputed at Customs locations/Customs Houses for verification of the GSTR.
