Follow Us :

Archive: 19 July 2016

Posts in 19 July 2016

Implementation of Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme 2016

July 19, 2016 25231 Views 0 comment Print

The Direct Tax Dispute Resolution Scheme, 2016 was introduced with effect from 01.06.2016 to address the issue of pending litigation before CsIT (A). Tax payers stand to benefit by a timely disposal of their litigation, while the Department stands to reduce its administrative cost in disposing appeals and also to collect its due taxes. Therefore, it becomes expedient on the part of all officers to ensure that the Scheme is a resounding success.

Am I required to file my income tax return?

July 19, 2016 41618 Views 5 comments Print

Salaried? You too need to file returns too!- While talking to some of my colleagues and friends who are salaried, I understand that majority of them are under the impression that as full tax has already been deducted from their salary, they are not required to file their income tax returns. T

CA Final Results: May 2003 – May 2016: Analysis of Last 27 Terms

July 19, 2016 53370 Views 0 comment Print

CA Final Results of MAY 2016 term declares today (18th July 2016) afternoon. First of all congratulations to NEWLY Qualified CA’s. In past we saw that there are vide variations in passing percentage in CA Final Exams. The same trend is continuing in the latest result. The passing percentage of both groups is double in comparison to last term.

Compensation paid for damage to environment is allowable

July 19, 2016 5863 Views 0 comment Print

The compensation was paid because the assessee had failed to install the pollution control device within the time prescribed. Therefore, payment of the sum of Rs.12,50,000/- is not hit by Explanation-1 to Section 37 of the Act. The Hon’ble judges of the Kolkata High Court by setting aside the orders of ITAT held that payment was und

Revenue sharing arrangements are liable to service tax: AAR

July 19, 2016 28965 Views 0 comment Print

AAR held that a revenue sharing arrangement by creating a partnering person shall be liable to service tax if the partners are providing taxable service to one another in execution of partnering purpose even if the purpose of creating partnering person is non-taxable.

Failure to give intimation not restricts Reversal of Proportionate Cenvat Credit

July 19, 2016 25422 Views 0 comment Print

Whether the option to reverse CENVAT credit, under Rule 6(3) (ii) of the CENVAT credit rules, 2004 (CCR) be denied merely on the ground that no intimation was given to the department?

Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031