Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 22 May 2013

Posts in 22 May 2013

Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) – In its new version

May 22, 2013 9402 Views 0 comment Print

Provisions of requirement of Tax Residency Certificate were introduced last year. The Finance Minister has attempted to make changes to the existing provisions. The author analyses the changes that are proposed and the possible effects.

Transfer Pricing – OECD revises Safe Harbouring Guidelines

May 22, 2013 1478 Views 0 comment Print

The existing language of Section E (paragraphs 4.93 through 4.122) would be removed and replaced with the following language. The enumeration of paragraphs of Section F would be adapted accordingly.

SC dismisses ICAI’s SLP on ceiling on number of tax audits

May 22, 2013 3957 Views 0 comment Print

These appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order dated 24.3.2005 passed in Writ Appeal No .1452 & 1453/1998 by the High Court of Madras quashing the notifications issued by the appellant by which it has quashed the notifications dated 25.5.1987 and 13.1.1989 by which certain regulatory measures have been taken by the appellant against its members.

Online Empanelment with Vijya Bank for Concurrent Audit

May 22, 2013 7301 Views 0 comment Print

Chartered Accountant firms for selection of Concurrent Auditors of the branches/offices – Vijya Bank calls applications from Chartered Accountant firms for selection of Concurrent Auditors of the branches/offices for the period from 01.07.2013 to 30.06.2014.

Income already offered for taxation cannot be taxed again as undisclosed income

May 22, 2013 1284 Views 0 comment Print

It is contended by the learned counsel that the sum of Rs. 16 lakhs added by the Assessing Officer as undisclosed income has already been offered as income by the assessee by way of forfeiture of booking advance.

Expense cannot be disallowed merely because assessee named it as short recovery and not bad debt

May 22, 2013 973 Views 0 comment Print

The undisputed facts are that the assessee was to receive the sum of 74,30,575/- from CCIL towards crane hire charges. However, actually, the assessee could receive only 58,39,011/-. The Revenue has not disputed the correctness of the assessee’s contention that it could not recover the sum of Rs. 16,66,081/-.

If AO says that assessee not maintained books of account than there is no question of producing the same by the assessee

May 22, 2013 543 Views 0 comment Print

We find that a clear finding was given by the Assessing Officer in para 13.2 of the assessment order in the case of Shri Pranbhai S Fultaria that assessee has not filed any return of income though specifically required u/s. 142(1) of the Act and assessee has not maintained books of account. Ld. CIT(A) has not given a finding that this observation of the AO in para-13.2 of the assessment order is incorrect that assessee is not maintaining any books of account.

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31