Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
NC Notification No. 83/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 466(E) dated the 29th March, 2007, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 1, “Satya Bharti Schools
NC Notification No. 82/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India, in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 466(E) dated the 29th March, 2007, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 21, “(i ) Running and Maintenance
NC Notification No. 81/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 2370(E) dated 23rd October, 2008, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 21, extension of running old age home and women upliftment campaign by
NC Notification No. 80/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 878(E) dated the 30th November, 1992, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 4, “Research and Rehabilitation Centre for the Deaf by Delhi Association of the Deaf, 92
NC Notification No. 79/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), number S.O. 901(E) dated the 20th September, 2001, issued under sub-section (1) read with clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Central Government had notified at serial number 3, “Construction of Building, Purchase of Library Books, Office
Notification No. 78/2010-Income Tax [F.No.178/100/2008-ITA-I], dated 11-10-2010 Government hereby notifies M/s. Marathon Nextgen Realty Limited, Mumbai as an undertaking and the project at Marathon Nextgen Innova IT Building, (Building No.7), Survey No. CS No. 2/142, Opp. Peninsula Corporate Park Off, Ganpatrao, Kadam Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai 400013, being developed and maintained and operated by the said undertaking, as an industrial park for the purposes of the said clause (iii) subject to the terms and conditions mentioned in the Schedule appended to this notification.
NC Notification No. 78/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 1145(E) dated 16th July, 2007, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 2, Sainik Ashram by Kerala Ex-Servicemen Welfare Association (KEXWA) Civil Station
NC Notification No. 77/2010-Income Tax WHEREAS by notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) number S.O. 466(E) dated 29th March, 2007, issued under clause (b) of the Explanation to section 35AC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Government had notified at serial number 18, Poverty alleviation through capacity building, market support and micro-credit programme for economically weaker section of the society by Development Initiative for Self-Help and Awakening (DISHA),
Decision of a company has to rest on views of majority; in case of disagreement by the minority, remedy lies u/s 397 & 398 and not in Civil Court. When a case falls within four corners of section 397 and/or section 398, ordinary civil court’s jurisdiction would stand barred to deal with such a dispute
It was the duty of the A.O. to bring on record sufficient evidences and material to prove that the documents filed by the assessee were bogus, false or fabricated and the long term capital gain shown by him was actually his income from undisclosed sources.
