Join our free webinar on July 4th at 4:00 PM to gain insights into the dematerialization of securities and recent amendments. Register now for key updates.
Join our free webinar on July 7 at 5 PM for insights into 10 recent High Court income tax judgments favoring assessees. Expert analysis by CA Dipak Dama.
Notification No. 72/2009 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 117 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby appoints the officer specified in column (2) of the Schedule below to be the Income tax authority as specified in column (3) having his headquarters at the place specified in column (4) of the said Schedule for such jurisdiction as
Notification No. 74/2009 & Notification No. 75/2009 – Income Tax Section 120(1) and (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Jurisdiction of income-tax authorities In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 196I (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that Chief Commissioner specified in column (2) of the Schedule below, having his headquarters at the place specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) of the said Schedule, shall exercise the powers and perform the functions in respect of such territorial area
Notification No. 40/2009-Service Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 93 of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994), the Central Government, on being satisfied that it is necessary in the public interest so to do, hereby makes the following further amendment in the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 17/2009-Service Tax, dated the 7th July, 2009, G.S.R. 489 (E), dated the 7th July, 2009.
S. 260A permits the filing of an appeal to the High Court within 120 days. In CIT vs. Velingkar Brothers 289 ITR 382 (Bom) (FB), The Full Bench held that the Court had power to condone delay u/s 260A. However, in Hongo India 236 E.L.T. 417 and Chaudharana Steels 238 E.L.T. 705, the Supreme Court held in the context of sections 35H & 35G
The Principal notification was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, vide Notification No. 36/2001 – Customs (N.T.), dated, the 3rd August, 2001 (S. O. 748 (E), dated, the 3rd August, 2001) and was last amended vide Notification No. 144/2009-Customs (N.T.), dated, the 15th September, 2009 (S. O. 2382 (E) dated 15th September, 2009).
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 and sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Excise and Customs hereby appoints the Commissioner of Customs, Mangalore to act as a common adjudicating authority to exercise the powers and discharge the duties conferred or imposed on the following adjudicating authorities mentioned in column (3) of the Table below in respect of Show Cause
for the purpose of adjudicating the matters relating to Show Cause Notice pertaining to M/s. Associated Aluminium Industries Private Limited, Survey No. 8, Village; Khutali, Khanvel-Doodhani Road, Near Khanvel, District; Silvassa, Union Territory of Dadar and Nagar Haveli and others, issued vide, F.No. DRI/SRU/INV-12/2006, date 31st January, 2008, by the Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ahmedabad Zonal Unit, Ahmedabad.
ACIT Vs M.K. Agrotech Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) Per A. Mohan Alankamony, Accountant Member These two appeals preferred – (i) by the assessee and (ii) another by the Revenue– are directed against the order of the CIT (A), Mysore, for the assessment year 2005-06. ITA NO.401 (By the assessee): 2. The assessee company has raised […]
The new notifications issued under the Advance Authorization, DFIA and EPCG schemes continue to stipulate that the exporter shall submit the proof of discharge of export obligation within the periods specified in the respective notifications. It is needless to stress that the stipulated conditions are required to be adhered to strictly; monitoring mechanism may be put in place and recovery action against defaulters initiated promptly.
In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (5) of section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), read with rule 23 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, the Central Government hereby rescinds the notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue), No. 109/2004- Customs, dated the 17th November, 2004, published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, section 3, sub-section (i) vide number G.S.R. 751(E), dated the 17th November, 2004, except as respects things done or omitted to be done before such rescission.
