Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 09 May 2008

Posts in 09 May 2008

Postmortem of Union Budget 2024: A Comprehensive Webinar

July 18, 2024 4656 Views 3 comments Print

Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!

Live Course on 360 degree Analysis of Input Tax Credit from a Litigation Perspective

July 18, 2024 4113 Views 0 comment Print

Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!

Amends certain notifications

May 9, 2008 268 Views 0 comment Print

The Principal notification No.97/2004-Customs, dated the 17th September, 2004 was published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-Section (1) vide number G.S.R 620 (E), dated the 17th September, 2004 and was last amended by notification No.116/2007-Customs, dated the 30th November, 2007 vide number G.S.R 745 (E), dated 30th November, 2007.

Exempts specified goods from duty of customs and additional duty

May 9, 2008 397 Views 0 comment Print

Capital goods in Semi Knocked Down (SKD) / Completely Knocked Down (CKD) conditions to be assembled into capital goods by the importer.

Circular No. 868/06/2008-Central Excise, Dated: 9.5.2008

May 9, 2008 1600 Views 0 comment Print

In the budget 2008-09, certain amendments have been carried out in the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 pertains to an assessee who manufactures dutiable and exempted goods and provision of taxable and exempted services. As a general principle, CENVAT credit is not allowed on input or input service used for the manufacture of exempted goods or provision of exempted services [refer Rule 6(1)]. Exception to Rule 6(1) is contained in rules 6(3), 6(5) and 6(6)

SC judgment on insertion of proviso to Section 10(23C)(vi)

May 9, 2008 3470 Views 0 comment Print

In American Hotel & Lodging Association, Educational Institute vs. CBDT 2008 (301) ITR 86 SC, the Supreme Court analysed the provision and found that the second proviso to Section 10(23C)(vi) lays down the powers and duties of the prescribed authority for vetting an application for approval and that the prescribed

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031