Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Archive: 27 September 2007

Posts in 27 September 2007

Postmortem of Union Budget 2024: A Comprehensive Webinar

July 16, 2024 3876 Views 3 comments Print

Join our webinar on July 24-25 for an in-depth analysis of Union Budget 2024. Learn about tax proposals, sector impacts, and investment insights. Register now!

Live Course on 360 degree Analysis of Input Tax Credit from a Litigation Perspective

July 14, 2024 3501 Views 0 comment Print

Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC complexities. Register now!

Company Law General Circular No: 13/2007 Dated: 27/09/2007

September 27, 2007 271 Views 0 comment Print

Order of the Company Law Board under Section 141 of the Companies Act, 1956 regarding extension of time for filing documents by companies and levy of additional fee.

Public Notice No. 53 (RE-2007)/2004-2009, Dated: 27.09.2007

September 27, 2007 298 Views 0 comment Print

In exercise of powers conferred under Paragraph 2.4 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009, the Director General of Foreign Trade hereby makes the following amendments in Handbook of Procedures.

Public Notice No. 52 (RE-2007)/2004-2009, Dated: 27.09.2007

September 27, 2007 472 Views 0 comment Print

It is further clarified that in SIONs where import of relevant fabric is permitted in terms of square meters per unit of an export product, the import of relevant fabric be limited to (10% + Actual utilization in Square Meters) or quantity permitted in SION, whichever is lower.

Vyaj badla dispute is not admissible in court

September 27, 2007 591 Views 0 comment Print

In a setback to the once popular vyaj badla transactions, the Bombay high court recently held that an aggrieved party cannot take their disputes to the arbitration tribunal set up under the byelaws of the Bombay Stock Exchange. Dismissing a petition filed by a Mahim-based partnership firm against a city broker, a division bench of Justice R M S Khandeparkar and Justice D G Karnik held that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear cases arising out of such private transactions.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031