It has come to notice of the Board that the assessing officers do not put their full signatures on the shipping bills. They merely put their initials on the shipping bills with a rubber stamp inducting the name of the office and in some cases, just an initial. It makes easier to forge such signatures. In the latter cases, there is no way of knowing at a future data the name of officer who had put the
I am directed to refer to board’s letter F.No.446/44/92-Cus. IV dated the 20th Sept., 1997 on the above subject. The said procedure was applicable for goods landed upto 31st March, 1997 and lying unclaimed/ uncleared in the air cargo complexes
References have been received from India Trade Promotion Organization, which organises export of Indian goods for exhibitions abroad and their subsequent re-import into the country, that during re-import a considerable time is taken at the Ports for examination of such goods
It has come to the notice of the Board that many parties had fraudulently cleared imported cargo from Bonded warehouses under Sec. 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 duty free for delivery to Naval Ships. Similar clearances were also noticed duty free under Notfn. No. 211/ 83 for use as ship spares. The modus-operandi in both cases were to clear the goods from the bonds and divert them to the local
Notification No. S.O.123(E)-Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (4) of section 139A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby specifies that every person who is assessed or liable to be assessed by an Assessing Officer under the control of any income-tax authority in India
