Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Multiple Units in a Single Building Qualify as ‘Residential House’ for Section 54/54F Exemption

Case Law Details

Case Name
CIT Vs Gita Duggal (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2007-08
Advertisement
CIT Vs Gita Duggal (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against Gita Duggal, an individual assessee, reaffirming that the exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, can be claimed even if the new residential house consists of multiple independent units. This ruling addresses a long-standing point of contention between taxpayers and the revenue authorities regarding the interpretation of “a residential house” in capital gains exemptions. The case involved Gita Duggal, who had declared long-term capital gains from...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments
  1. I fully agree with R. Ramamurthy. It is not possible in many situation where the assesses invest full amount of capital gain in one unit. the assesses compromise in all respect because of income tax.

    I think CBDT to issue the circular and clarify in this matter.

  2. It is high time for the CBDT to issue ciruclar instructions to department officers to accept the claim of deduction u/s.54/54F of the above nature. It is the period of apartment age. It is difficult to have one Big unit in one floor of anApartment for various reasons. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court as very well explained the intentions of the land owner. As long as the budilding is used for residential purposes the exemption needs to be given and the deniel of exemption can be only when it is used for commercial purposes. Change of cirucumstances only made the Revenue to introduce section 54F of the Act and I do not know why such beneficial provision be curftailed placing unrealistic interpretations by the Department Officials.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *