ITAT Mumbai allowed Saurashtra Cement’s appeal, ruling that disallowance under Section 14A r/w Rule 8D cannot be made if Assessee did not earn any exempt income during financial year. Ruling deletes an addition of ₹1.15 crore.
Delhi HC prima facie held that National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) lacked jurisdiction to prevent Axis Bank from enforcing its security interest under SARFAESI Act and stayed summons requiring personal appearance of bank’s MD and CEO.
The High Court directed the GST authority to consider dropping the cancellation proceedings and restoring the registration if the taxpayer pays all pending tax dues, interest, and late fees. The ruling applied the proviso to Rule 22(4) of the CGST Rules.
Tribunal remanded case to CIT(A), holding that assessee’s Section 80P deduction claim must be reconsidered after CCIT Coimbatore decides condonation petition under Section 119(2)(b).
NCLT Delhi admitted Bank of India’s insolvency petition against TDT Copper Ltd for default of ₹153.98 crore, initiating CIRP and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional.
The ITAT Chennai held that ₹1.98 crore received for reduction in profit-sharing ratio in CRCL LLP was not goodwill or taxable income under the Income Tax Act.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2015-16 due to the tax effect falling below the CBDT’s prescribed limit of Rs. 60 lacs. For AY 2020-21, the appeal was dismissed, upholding the deletion of additions for dies for new model development and productivity maintenance expenditure based on judicial consistency.
ITAT Pune held that assessee was engaged in livestock transport on commission basis and not in trading, directing AO to apply 1.5% profit rate instead of 8% estimated earlier.
ITAT restricted the addition under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to 50% on a jointly purchased property, preventing double addition as the co-owner was already taxed on the balance.
ITAT restored a disallowance of ₹18.76 Cr under Section 40(a)(ia) for non-deduction of TDS u/s 194Q to CIT(A), granting assessee a fresh opportunity. Mumbai ITAT remanded a tax appeal concerning substantial business purchases, directing CIT(A) to hear assessee on merits for non-compliance.
