ITAT Delhi held that the payments received by the assessee in view of architectural design services rendered to its clients in India are not chargeable to tax as FTS in terms of Article 12(4) of the India-Singapore DTAA.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that interest income earned by depositing surplus grants in a particular mode as per the directions of the State Government is also treated as part of the grants and hence it cannot be treated as income of the assessee.
Learn about the ITAT Chennai verdict in Palaniappa Charitable Vs ITO where income from commercial activities carried out by the trust was not considered exempted from income tax.
Orissa High Court dismisses the petition filed by Khimji Super Bikes LLP against the State of Odisha and others. The court states non-compliance with the direction to file Form-F under Odisha Motor Vehicles Taxation Rules as the reason for the dismissal.
The Patna High Court dismisses the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The court deems four years as a reasonable time of limitation for an order under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act.
Comfort Polymers Pvt. Ltd. wins the case against CCE- Jammu at CESTAT Chandigarh. CENVAT credit on destroyed goods is allowed as per Rule 3(5B) and 3(5C) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
The Bombay High Court upheld the income tax deduction under Section 80IA(4)(iii) for an Industrial Park project. The court considered the approval granted by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry and rejected the AO’s disallowance based on an erroneous report.
The Madras High Court orders the provisional release of a seized car and cash in the case of Eburamusa Sherif vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs. The court sets certain conditions for the release.
ITAT Delhi quashes reassessment proceedings for AY 2009-10 in the case of Agroha Fincap Ltd. The approval u/s 151 of the Income Tax Act was found to be defective and without due application of mind.
The petitioner would not have delayed the return as it was entitled for a refund. Cause of justice should not be defeated for technicalities.
