ITAT Ahmedabad held that services do not qualify as Fee for Technical Services [FTS] under India-Netherlands tax treaty since department failed to demonstrate that technology was ‘make available’ to recipient of services.
ITAT remits the case of Rahul Kumar Singh to the AO after the assessee’s failure to respond to notices, directing the inclusion of new evidence submitted by the appellant.
Assessee was entitled for exemption under section 10(10B) for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) compensation on whole of the amount received citing that the Central-Government approved schemes that benefited Employees.
NCLAT Delhi held that regulation 16A(3A) of the CIRP Regulations has to be followed for replacement of Authorised Representatives. Adjudicating Authority duly relied on regulation 16A(3A) and rejected the application of the appellant.
Delhi HC orders Customs to release bank guarantee with interest to Om Gems & Jewellery, directing compliance with previous judgment on gold imports.
Delhi High Court held that repeated placing of the matter in the call book is not a valid justification for non-adjudication of show cause notice for about 15 years. Accordingly, order passed is liable to be quashed due to delay in adjudication.
AO had raised queries on two issues i.e. (i) assessee claimed only 15% depreciation on the Higher Efficiency Boilers (being energy saving device), when it was eligible for depreciation allowance of 80% on the Written Down Value (WDV).
NCLAT ruled that issue of whether workers were entitled to claim their dues under Industrial Disputes Act during layoff period should be decided by appropriate labour authorities and not within CIRP proceedings.
After considering submissions made by both parties it is held that there is no dispute that the appellant stood as a guarantor for the loan availed by the CD which has already been admitted into CIRP
Every deposit in the bank account cannot always be an income. Therefore, condition of deposit of advance tax could not be imposed blindly without considering contention of assessee that his income was below the taxable limit.
