The Court held that reopening based on wrong assumptions about return filing and without supporting material is invalid. Mechanical recording of reasons cannot confer jurisdiction.
The Tribunal held that once bills and vouchers are furnished, ad hoc disallowance of expenses is unjustified. Unsupported estimations without defects cannot sustain additions.
The case addressed the correct head of income for interest earned on staff loans. The court affirmed the Tribunal’s finding that such income arises in the normal course of business and found no ground to interfere.
The issue was whether interest could be taxed on interest-free advances where no interest was charged or received. The Tribunal held that hypothetical income cannot be taxed without accrual or deeming provision. The ruling reinforces that only real income is taxable.
The Court set aside a reassessment order passed in the name of a deceased assessee, holding that proceedings cannot continue after authorities are informed of death. Fresh proceedings may be initiated against legal representatives as per law.
The tribunal held that a petition is not maintainable where the applicant is neither a shareholder nor member, and where disputes stem from a private MoU rather than company affairs.
The tribunal allowed a remand where unexplained cash deposits were added based on a PAN-linked account. The key takeaway is that effective opportunity must be given to disown alleged accounts.
Reversal ordered due to cancelled registration was set aside once the cancellation itself was undone. The ruling reaffirmed the linkage between valid cancellation and ITC reversal.
The Tribunal held that merely reclassifying a disclosed business loss as speculative loss does not amount to under-reporting. Penalty under section 270A was therefore deleted.
The authority rejected the refund citing non-submission of LUT before export. The court found that the clarification allowing ex post facto LUT was ignored and ordered reconsideration.
