ITAT Ahmedabad held that Sale/ conversion of business of assessee-firm as a going concern to company for consideration of paid up share capital does not amount to transfer liable to tax as capital gains.
ITAT Delhi quashed the penalty order passed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act as service of notice by way of affixture on the Assessee cannot be construed as sufficient Service of Notice.
In present facts of the case, the Revision Petition was filed under section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which assails order dated 06.02.2015 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow.
In present facts of the case, the revision petition was filed under section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 assailing the order dated 11.08.2017 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Pandri, Raipur.
Supreme Court upheld an order by Settlement Commission granting immunity from penalty and prosecution, emphasizing importance of full disclosure and cooperation.
In a recent case, the Madras High Court ruled that validly availed credit cannot be denied, even if there were mistakes in TRAN-1 returns filed twice. Get insights into the judgment here
Explore the case of Amba Shakti Udyog Ltd. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. Delve into the importance of timely appeals under Section 107 of the GST Act and the role of delay condonation.
Analysis of Salim Mohammad vs. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue case. Calcutta High Court remands GST penalty case for reconsideration, citing issues with interpretation. Explore the details.
Analysis of Mohler Machine Works Pvt. Ltd. vs. PCIT case. Madras High Court sets aside order by NFAC and PCIT, citing lack of clear findings and directs reassessment. Explore the details.
Analysis of Purushottam Sharma vs. DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur) case. Is income from LIC commission considered business income or other sources? Explore the legal arguments and conclusions.
