Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Purushottam Sharma Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 116/Jodh/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/09/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Purushottam Sharma Vs DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur)

Introduction: The case of Purushottam Sharma vs. DCIT (ITAT Jodhpur) revolves around a crucial taxation question – whether income from LIC (Life Insurance Corporation) commission should be categorized as income from business or income from other sources. Additionally, the case examines the eligibility of expenses for deduction. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of this case, highlighting the arguments presented and the ultimate conclusion reached by the tribunal.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Nature of Income: The primary issue in this case is the nature of the income earned by the assessee, who is an LIC agent. The Central Processing Centre (CPC) classified it as “commission income” and allowed no further deductions. The question arises whether this income should indeed be categorized as business income or income from other sources.

2. Application under Section 154: The assessee filed an application under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking rectification. However, this application was rejected without providing substantial reasons.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031