The Supreme Court held that bail was wrongly granted without considering medical and eyewitness evidence. The ruling underscores that serious offences require careful judicial scrutiny before granting bail.
The AAR disposed of the case after the applicant voluntarily withdrew its request for clarification. No ruling was given on GST liability or ITC for recoveries made from employees.
The AAR disposed of the application after the applicant voluntarily withdrew it. No ruling was issued on whether the services qualified as export of services or were covered by the exemption entry.
The Authority disposed of the GST advance ruling application after the applicant voluntarily withdrew it. No findings were given on taxability or exemption issues, as the matter was closed without examining merits.
ITAT held that CPC cannot deny charitable exemption under section 11 through section 143(1) adjustment without issuing prior intimation. The matter was restored to the AO for fresh examination after due opportunity.
The Court allowed the assessee to seek revocation of GST cancellation and regularise returns after expressing willingness to clear dues. Bank accounts were ordered to be defreezed subject to statutory conditions.
The High Court held that claiming ITC in April for goods received then, though invoiced in March, does not amount to tax evasion. The dispute was held to require reconciliation, not penal action.
The Court quashed rejection of a GST rectification application after finding that reconciliation statements and portal records were ignored and no personal hearing was granted, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
The case addressed cancellation of GST registration due to non-filing of returns. The High Court allowed the taxpayer to seek revocation by filing pending returns and paying dues.
The High Court held that continued detention was unnecessary after joint interrogation. Bail was directed following a short extension for further investigation.
