Shri Rupesh Rashmikant Shah Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) In the context of interest, there are three crucial dates. The date of the accident is a date in reference to which the entire compensation is calculated. The date of filing of the claim petition is the date from which the claimant […]
Delhi High Court has observed that second proviso to Customs Section 110(2), stating that in case of provisional release, period of 6 months for SCN would not apply, is to make sure that at least seized goods are provisionally released quickly. The Court held that 2nd proviso, inserted by Finance Act, 2018, did not take away what was already available to assessee and hence the proviso was not applied retrospectively.
In re M/s Keysight Technologies International India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) Much-awaited clarity was recently provided by AAR- Haryana wherein the applicant raised questions on Taxability of Electricity reimbursements by the Tenants to the landlords. There is this general practice wherein the Electricity connection is in the name of the building owners and Lease/Rent […]
Chandra Prakash Jhunjhunwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT The captioned appeal filed by the Assessee, pertaining to assessment year 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-21, Kolkata, which in turn arises out of an assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) […]
In these two OAs, the grievance of the applicants is that their applications for selection to the post of Member, Income Tax, Appellate Tribunal are not being treated as valid on account of the fact that their APARs were not received before the stipulated date i.e. 20.08.2018.
Judgement dated 9th August, 2019 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the matter of Pioneer Urban Land and Infrastructure Limited and Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. WP (C) No. 43/2019 and other petitions. While dismissing the various petitions filed by builders and upholding the constitutional validity of status of allottees as financial […]
AO was not justified in adding the entire suppressed receipts after rejection of books of accounts while making assessment u/s 153A as CIT(A) was fair enough to apply 2% of net profit rate on the alleged suppressed receipts by taking basis of net profit rate disclosed by the assessee for various assessment years which ranges from 0.5% to 2.05%.
ITO Vs Mukesh Champaklal Shah (ITAT Pune) The definition of capital asset excludes agricultural land and certain criteria have been placed in this statue to qualify the land as agricultural land. The facts on records demonstrate that both the parties have accepted the land to be an agricultural land. The 7/12 extracts clearly demonstrates the […]
Sharing of the profit or income under the agreement between the parties and assessee and 80% of the income was going to the commercial entities clearly established the intention of the parties in this arrangements being for profit were not solely for providing education, therefore, the benefit of Section 10(23C)(iiiad) was not available to assessee.
In re Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) i. Whether the Deposit Work undertaken by Applicant is an integral part of supply of services of transmission or distribution of electricity? Ans: No. ii. Whether the Deposit Work undertaken by Applicant is ancillary to the principal supply of transmission or distribution of […]
