The High Court granted bail in a ₹35 crore GST evasion case, noting the petitioner’s voluntary deposit of ₹1.25 crore and medical grounds, subject to strict conditions.
The Tribunal ruled that leftover offshore materials used at Bombay High had already suffered duty and were not freshly imported, making the customs demand and penalties unsustainable.
The Supreme Court stayed recovery of tax and interest demanded for non-deduction of TDS on foreign LTC reimbursements. The matter has been tagged with a related SLP for further consideration.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that appellate authorities can entertain fresh legal claims even if not made in the return of income. BSNL VRS-2019 compensation was held exempt u/s 10(10B), and rejection by CIT(A) was set aside.
The High Court ruled that LTC involving foreign travel is not exempt under Section 10(5) and TDS must be deducted under Section 192. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose.
Supreme Court held that no Court inferior to Court of Sessions shall try an offence punishable under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Accordingly, High Court rightly dismissed petition filed u/s. 482 for quashing of complaint. Thus, present appeal stands dismissed.
ITAT Lucknow held that additions under Section 68 in search cases cannot be made without incriminating material found during search. Penny stock LTCG additions were deleted and departmental appeals dismissed.
ITAT Lucknow held that revision under Section 263 cannot be invoked without specifying what enquiries the AO failed to conduct. As the PCIT did not spell out such deficiencies, the revision order was quashed.
ITAT Lucknow held that exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) cannot be denied merely due to incorrect section selection in the ITR. The matter was remanded to the AO to examine eligibility on merits after proper hearing.
The ITAT Raipur held that prior to 1 June 2015, there was no enabling provision under Section 200A to levy late filing fees under Section 234E while processing TDS returns. The Tribunal ruled the demand for A.Y. 2013-14 unsustainable and deleted the levy.
