Follow Us:

Judiciary

ITAT Pune: Reopening After 4 Years Invalid When Share Premium Details Already Disclosed – Rs. 30 Cr Addition u/s 68 Deleted

March 14, 2026 492 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that reopening an assessment after four years is invalid when the assessee has fully disclosed all material facts during the original scrutiny. The reassessment was quashed for lack of new material evidence.

Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Treated as Income – ITAT Directs 8% Profit Estimation

March 14, 2026 1071 Views 0 comment Print

The issue was whether the entire bank deposits could be treated as unexplained income under Section 69. The tribunal held that deposits linked to business activity cannot be fully taxed and directed estimation of profit at 8%.

Penalty U/s 271DA & 271E Invalid When Original Assessment Set Aside – ITAT Deletes Penalties

March 14, 2026 744 Views 0 comment Print

The tribunal examined whether penalties could continue when the fresh assessment order did not record satisfaction for initiating them. It ruled that absence of such satisfaction makes the penalties invalid in law.

Bank Deposits Treated as Business Receipts – ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹1.71 Cr Addition u/s 69A

March 14, 2026 843 Views 0 comment Print

The tribunal considered whether total bank credits could be added as unexplained money. It held that when deposits are consistent with declared turnover and business activity, they cannot be treated as unexplained income.

Reassessment Quashed – Notice U/s 148 Held Time-Barred & Ante-Dated

March 14, 2026 5055 Views 0 comment Print

The tribunal noted discrepancies in the dispatch register used to prove issuance of the notice. Because the records did not inspire confidence, the tribunal held the reassessment notice to be time-barred.

ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band

March 13, 2026 1515 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that when the difference between purchase price and DVO valuation falls within the 10% tolerance band, no addition can be made under section 56(2)(vii). The addition based on stamp duty value was therefore deleted.

Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause

March 13, 2026 1269 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Chennai deletes Sec 270A penalty, ruling 200% penalty for misreporting cannot be imposed without specifying clause of Sec 270A(9) or proper reasoning.

ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities

March 13, 2026 759 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal held that failure to start charitable activities cannot by itself justify denial of registration under section 12AB. Since the trust’s objects were charitable and proposed activities were genuine, the rejection of registration and 80G approval was set aside.

Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Deemed Addition U/s 56(2)(vii)(b) – ITAT Chennai

March 13, 2026 645 Views 0 comment Print

The Tribunal examined whether penalty under Section 271(1)(c) can arise when income is added due to the deeming provision under Section 56(2)(vii)(b). It held that a stamp duty valuation difference alone does not establish concealment, so penalty cannot be sustained

ITAT Chennai: 60% Tax U/s 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 Transactions Prior to 01-04-2017

March 13, 2026 891 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Chennai rules 60% tax under Section 115BBE not applicable to AY 2017-18 transactions before 01-04-2017; directs tax on ₹30.43 lakh addition at 30%.

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930