For deduction on carbon credits, Section 80-IA deduction on the sale of CERs must be allowed; gains from the prepayment of deferred sales tax constituted capital receipts, meaning Commissioner’s relief required no interference.
The Bombay High Court held that a provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act automatically ceases after one year. The Court directed de-freezing of the account, ruling that the attachment had lapsed by operation of law.
The Delhi ITAT held that lack of knowledge of the assessment order constituted sufficient cause for delayed filing before the CIT(A). The Tribunal restored the matter for fresh adjudication on merits after condoning the delay.
ITAT Mumbai held that where reassessment is based on documents seized during a search on another person, proceedings must be initiated under Section 153C and not Section 147.
The Tribunal accepted the assessee’s claim that the opening capital figure in the earlier ITR was wrongly reported due to omissions of FDRs and bank balances. Since the assets already existed in the preceding year, the addition under Section 68 was held unsustainable.
The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against the Allahabad High Court ruling holding that confiscation proceedings under Section 130 cannot be initiated merely because excess stock was found during survey.
The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP against the Allahabad High Court ruling holding that mere excess stock found during survey cannot justify confiscation proceedings under Section 130 of the GST Act.
The Bangalore ITAT held that a genuine clerical mistake in Form 10 cannot deprive a charitable trust of exemption under Section 11(2) when the accumulation claim was properly disclosed elsewhere and corrected before assessment completion.
The Tribunal ruled that a Section 153C notice issued beyond the statutory ten-year period could not survive in law. The assessment order passed pursuant to such notice was therefore annulled as time-barred.
The Tribunal set aside the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication of the co-operative housing society’s deduction claim under Section 80P(2)(d). The ruling emphasized that the claim required proper factual verification instead of outright rejection.
