Sponsored
    Follow Us:

section 254

Latest Articles


Third Proviso to Section 254(2A) of Income Tax Act is Arbitrary & Unconstitutional

Income Tax : The three-judge bench of Supreme Court of India in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Pepsi Foods Ltd struck dow...

June 7, 2021 3801 Views 0 comment Print

Prosecution – made more simpler for revenue

Income Tax : A perusal of this order reveals that the Tribunal has recorded a finding that it is empowered by Section 254 of the Act to stay pr...

October 31, 2015 2770 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Provide Shorter Time For Rectification Of Mistake by Tribunal

Income Tax : The existing provisions of Section 254(2) provide for a time-limit of four years from the date of the order of the Appellate Tribu...

January 19, 2016 1054 Views 1 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Notice Sent On Incorrect Email Constitutes Improper Service: ITAT Ahmedabad

Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad rules improper service of notice due to incorrect email address in the case of LMP Motors Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT, highlig...

July 8, 2024 420 Views 0 comment Print

Income Tax Appeal dismissal without considering merits: Kerala HC Restores Matter To ITAT

Income Tax : Kerala High Court restores Cool Mind Technologies' income tax appeal, emphasizing ITAT's obligation to consider appeals on merits ...

June 23, 2024 333 Views 0 comment Print

After TPO’s Order, AO Obligated to Follow Section 92CA(4) for Assessment

Income Tax : The Delhi High Court ruled that once a TPO issues an order, the AO must pass an assessment order per Section 92CA(4) of the Income...

May 30, 2024 543 Views 0 comment Print

No Section 56(2)(viib) Addition Required for Discrepancy of less than 10%

Income Tax : Discover the ITAT Delhi's ruling on Sakshi Fincap Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO, addressing valuation discrepancies and retrospective amendmen...

May 24, 2024 738 Views 0 comment Print

Section 153(2A): One-Year Limit for Consequential Orders after Remand

Income Tax : Kerala High Court ruling emphasizes time limits in Income Tax Act assessments on remand. Detailed analysis of Joseph Michael vs. D...

May 8, 2024 468 Views 0 comment Print


Assessee not allowed to raise same issue again in the guise of rectification before ITAT

January 11, 2013 867 Views 0 comment Print

On going through the order passed by the Tribunal, it is found that the Tribunal passed the order, after marshalling at the facts considering the submissions made before it and applying its mind to the decisions cited before it. There is no mistake in the order of the Tribunal of the nature as envisaged under section 254(2). Permitting the assessee to raise the same issues over again in the guise of rectification will amount to recalling the appellate order in its entirety and rehearing it afresh, which is not within the scope and ambit of section 254(2).

Power to rectify a mistake u/s. 254(2) cannot be used for recalling entire order

December 31, 2012 426 Views 0 comment Print

The words used in s. 254(2) are ‘shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice’. Clearly, if there is a mistake, then an amendment is required to be carried out in the original order to correct that particular mistake. The provision does not indicate that the Tribunal can recall the entire order and pass a fresh decision.

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031