Income Tax : All about interest under sections 234A, 234B, 234C, and 234D of the Income Tax Act, including when it is charged, rates, and calcu...
Income Tax : Due to any reason, in case the income tax department makes an excess refund to the taxpayer. Such taxpayer will have to return the...
Income Tax : Section 234D in Income Tax Act, 1961 was introduced in the act to cover those situations where the refund was issued to the assess...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act not justified since loan ...
Income Tax : Hire charges of a vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ as it was in the nature of business income and as there was no Permanent...
Income Tax : In a recent ruling ITAT Delhi relied upon the binding precedent of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of CIT vs. Sub...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court held that assessee is entitled to confine the settlement of disputes which were subject matter of its appeal file...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad remands case to DRP, allowing appeal on the grounds of curable defects in Form 35A submitted by Rajendra Ramjibhai...
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act not justified since loan transactions were done through banking channels and loans were repaid in short period. Accordingly, addition deleted.
Hire charges of a vessel did not constitute ‘Royalty’ as it was in the nature of business income and as there was no Permanent Establishment therefore, no taxability arose on account of business income.
In a recent ruling ITAT Delhi relied upon the binding precedent of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of CIT vs. Subros Educational Society, (2018) 96 taxmann.com 652 (SC) in deciding that the set off of accumulated deficit is allowable.
Delhi High Court held that assessee is entitled to confine the settlement of disputes which were subject matter of its appeal filed before appellate authority under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 [DTVSV Act].
ITAT Ahmedabad remands case to DRP, allowing appeal on the grounds of curable defects in Form 35A submitted by Rajendra Ramjibhai Patel.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules in favor of a co-op housing society, deleting addition based on assumed 8% net profit from unsecured loans taken from non-members.
AO, however, did not accept the explanation of the assessee and the accumulation of income of Rs.5,92,352/-in A.Y. 2008-09, which was held as not applied within the stipulated period of 5 years, was treated as income of the current year.
Assessee challenged the disallowance before the Chennai bench of ITAT arguing that the disallowance of Rs. 134.25 crore under Section 14A was excessive and not justified because only Rs. 74.98 lakh had been spent to earn the exempt income.
ITAT Delhi restored Fiserv India’s appeal, citing CIT(A)’s failure to address adjournment requests. The case will be reconsidered for a fair hearing and review.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that initiation of proceedings u/s. 147 of the Income Tax Act based on material found during search of another company is untenable as proceedings should be initiated u/s. 153C and not u/s. 147.
