Goods and Services Tax : This update highlights all major compliance due dates for April 2026 under Income Tax and GST laws. It helps taxpayers stay on tra...
Income Tax : Learn about TDS on commission and brokerage under Section 194H, including rates, thresholds, and liability. Key updates for FY 202...
Income Tax : Explore major income tax updates for FY 2025-26, including revised tax slabs, TDS/TCS rules, rebates, and benefits for startups. S...
Income Tax : The introduction of Section 194O in the Income Tax Act, 1961 for e-commerce transactions, has created certain overlaps with Sectio...
Income Tax : Section 194H amendment raises TDS threshold for commission or brokerage payments from Rs. 15,000 to Rs. 20,000, effective from Apr...
Income Tax : Understand Section 194H of the Income-tax Act: It mandates a 5% TDS on commission or brokerage payments to residents, soon reducin...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai remanded ₹95.81 lakh commission disallowance, holding that non-response to Section 133(6) notices alone cannot justi...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that Advertisement, Marketing & Promotion expense [AMP expense] incurred by Make My Trip wholly and exclusively fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Bangalore held that year-end expense provisions can attract TDS under the IT Act. The matter was restored for limited verific...
Income Tax : The ruling reiterates that adjudication based on incorrect material vitiates the entire order. The matter was remanded to ensure p...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that discounts given to stockists in pharmaceutical distribution are part of sale transactions on a principal-to...
Finance : All TDS deductions under Sections 194A, 194H, 194EE, and 194N will now be recorded at CPRC, streamlining reporting and compliance....
Income Tax : Changes in TDS deductions under Finance Act 2025 include revised thresholds for Sections 194A, 194H, and 80CCA. Effective from Apr...
Income Tax : TDS on agents commission reduced from 5% to 2% as per the Finance Bill 2024. New rate effective from October 1, 2024, under Sectio...
Income Tax : Law Related to Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) on payments by television channels and publishing houses to advertisement companies f...
Issuance Of Letters Of Comfort/Support will Construe As International Transaction U/s 92B considering corporate guarantee issued by assessee could not be compared with the letters of comfort and therefore agreed with the computation of arm’s length rate of 0.04%.
Expenditure incurred by assessee should be disallowed to the extent that expenditure which had been incurred for evaluation of business opportunities that could not be said to be in line with the existing business or an extension of the existing business of assessee of manufacturing of paints and enamels.
Discover how Chennai ITAT’s verdict affects assessments. Learn how a typographical error in Form 3CD impacts additions to an assessee’s income.
Explore the Supreme Court interpretation of Section 194-H of the Income Tax Act, 1961, analyzing the distinction between commission-based principal-agent relationships and discount-based sales.
Read about the Madras High Court’s decision in Rangaswamy Jeevanantham vs Superintendent case, where GST liability and TDS on Salary deduction under section 194H were disputed, leading to an order for a statutory appeal.
Supreme Court ruling on TDS under S.194-H: Business transactions where assessee isn’t responsible for payment do not attract TDS. Key insights explained.
Rajkot ITAT finds BSNL not in default for TDS on discounts to distributors, emphasizing correct TDS rates compliance for AY 2009-10. Appeals allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that consideration for sale distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films would not fall under the domain of “Royalty” and accordingly TDS not deductible on the same.
ITAT Mumbai held that the assessee is not liable to deduct tax at source from the discount paid on prepaid sim card/recharge vouchers. Thus, disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act liable to be deleted.
HC court upheld factual findings of lower authorities, emphasizing its limited jurisdiction under Section 260A of Income Tax Act. It clarified that it cannot reevaluate questions of fact in the absence of any grounds alleging perversity in the findings.
