Income Tax : Explore how electronic data transforms tax assessments, highlighting accuracy issues, verification needs, and taxpayer rights as s...
Income Tax : Learn about the revised procedure for reopening cases under Section 148 RWS 135A and the implications of Finance Act 2021, includi...
Income Tax : Discover the key amendments in the Finance (No.2) Bill, 2024, affecting income tax reassessment procedures under the Income-tax Ac...
Income Tax : Explore the Bombay High Court's ruling on the invalidity of a reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, f...
Income Tax : Explore the legality of issuing a second notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the same assessment year. Unders...
Income Tax : Learn about the new block assessment provisions for cases involving searches under section 132 and requisitions under section 132A...
Income Tax : Discover how Finance Act 2021 revamped assessment and reassessment procedures under Income-tax Act, impacting notices, time limits...
Income Tax : Humble Representation for modification of Section 151 of the Income Tax Act relating to Sanction for issue of Notice under sec. 14...
Income Tax : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association requested CBDT to issue Clarification in respect of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme...
Income Tax : In view of Indiscriminate notices by income Tax Department without allowing reasonable time it is requested to Finance Ministry an...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that issuance of notice under section 148A of the Income Tax Act by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer and no...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that CIT has not applied his mind analytically while assuming jurisdiction for taking cognizance under section 2...
Income Tax : ITAT Pune restored the assessment order as assessee neither filed any evidence nor provided material in an attempt to discharge th...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that reassessment action under section 148 of the Income Tax Act post approval of the resolution plan unsust...
Income Tax : Patna High Court held that for migrating PAN to new AO, due to change in address, a written request to existing AO must be made. S...
Income Tax : Explore the latest guidelines for issuing notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Understand key procedures, amendme...
Income Tax : Explore e-Verification Instruction No. 2 of 2024 from the Directorate of Income Tax (Systems). Detailed guidelines for AOs under I...
Income Tax : Supreme Court in the matter of Shri Ashish Agarwal, several representations were received asking for time-barring date of such cas...
Corporate Law : Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association (W.B.) Unit Date: 02.02.2023. To The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, W...
Income Tax : Consequent to order passed by Allahabad High Court passing severe strictures and proposing to levy exemplary cost of Rs 50 lakhs i...
Learn about the validity of re-assessment without notice u/s 143(2) in the case of Gonuguntla Nirmala Devi vs. ACIT. Explore the full text of the ITAT Hyderabad order.
The ITAT Mumbai invalidates reopening of assessment after 4 years with the approval of Joint Commissioner in the case of Maiden Marketing India Private Limited. Learn the detailed analysis of this decision.
In the case of Bharat Electronics Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore), the reassessment was found void as it relied on a mere change of opinion without new evidence.
In a landmark decision, ITAT Delhi rules no penalty under 271(1)(c) for a bonafide assessee who revised and added interest income. Analysis of Pramila Tarneja Vs DCIT case.
ITAT Mumbai held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on the information received from the investigation wing is valid and sustainable in law.
ITAT Delhi held that the date of dispatch from the adjudicating officer is relevant for determining the limitation period. Accordingly, assessment order dispatched beyond time limit prescribed u/s. 153(1) is barred by limitation.
Explore the case of Darshana Anand Damle vs. DCIT in the Bombay High Court regarding a land development agreement and its tax implications.
ITAT Mumbai held that damage on account of right to sue is a capital receipt and accordingly not chargeable to tax.
Delhi High Court held that Amazon Web Services India Pvt. Ltd. (AWS India) is liable to withhold 8% (instead of 16%) tax of remittance on account of reseller fee paid to AWS USA.
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of information from other officer without cogent and demonstrable material unjustified.
