Income Tax : Learn about common income tax notices for salaried individuals, their implications, and steps to handle them effectively. Avoid le...
Income Tax : Supreme Court disallows ₹10 crore bad debt deduction for Khyati Realtors Pvt Ltd, ruling it as capital expenditure, not eligible...
Income Tax : Learn about rectifying mistakes in income tax orders under Section 154, including types of rectifiable orders, responsible authori...
Income Tax : Learn about the Faceless Income-Tax Proceedings, including e-Proceedings features, differences from manual assessments, and how to...
Income Tax : Understand the implications of receiving a notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Learn how to respond, time limits, a...
Income Tax : Read how Income Tax Gazetted Officers’ Association addresses last-minute case reallocations affecting timely issuance of notices...
Income Tax : The Supreme Court has ruled that it is mandatory for the Income Tax Department to issue notice within the prescribed time limit of...
Income Tax : ITAT Raipur held that penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act justifiable since no plausible explanation provided fo...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur held that issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act by ACIT, Jaipur, is illegal and liable to be quas...
Income Tax : ITAT Kolkata held that reopening of assessment framed u/s. 148A(d) without application of mind and without controverting the expla...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that reopening of an assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of communication...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that addition under section 69 towards unexplained cash made by the AO without bringing any concrete evidence on ...
Income Tax : Understand the guidelines set by the Indian Ministry of Finance for the compulsory selection of returns for complete scrutiny duri...
Income Tax : CBDT hereby authorises the Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax/Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (NaFAC) having her / his headqua...
Income Tax : The three formats of notice(s) are: Limited Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scrutiny Selection}, Complete Scrutiny (Computer Aided Scruti...
Income Tax : Central Board of Direct Taxes, with approval of the Revenue Secretary, has decided to modify notice under section 143(2) of the In...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Mumbai invalidates income tax assessment for a merged entity, emphasizing the legal principle against actions on non-existent entities.
Discover the ITAT Bangalore ruling on IBM Canada Limited vs. DCIT, where salary reimbursements of seconded employees were deemed non-taxable as fees for technical services.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi’s order on the invalid notice issued before filing ITR, leading to the quashing of the assessment order in the case of Mideast Integrated Steels Ltd Vs ACIT.
Assessee was a commercial bank having its head office in France and had 8 branches in India. Assessee was involved in normal banking activities including financing of foreign trade and foreign exchange transaction
Pilani Industrial Corporation Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) case analysis. The ITAT Delhi ruled that cash deposits during demonetization can’t be deemed unexplained without rejecting the books of account. Full text of the order included.
ITAT Ahmedabad rules against reopening of assessment for protective addition when based on assumptions, deleting the addition. Read the detailed analysis here.
ITAT Delhi rules that the accepted investment source by AO cannot be rectified under Section 154, quashing the income tax assessment order.
Explore the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling on Intas Pharmaceuticals Vs ACIT, focusing on working capital adjustment and notional interest on trade receivables.
In Karan Jain vs. Union of India, Guwahati High Court rules that non-disclosure of exempt LTCG does not result in revenue loss. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
In Bal Krishan Das Mundhra Vs ITO case, ITAT Kolkata permits deduction of Rs. 34.2 lakhs under section 57 of Income Tax Act as taxpayer consistently follows mercantile system.