Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC criticizes Commercial Tax Dept for not offering personal hearings to assessees, reinforcing the importance of natural...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the significance of personal hearings under GST Section 75(4), backed by judicial precedents, ensuring fairness in assessm...
Fema / RBI : Article explains latest judgement of Indian Apex Court that the RBI's Master Directions on Fraud must adhere to the principles of ...
Corporate Law : A contractual employee is defined under Section 2(b) of The Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 which states that ...
Goods and Services Tax : HC quashed the assessment orders passed by Revenue Department, on the grounds that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the a...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court overturns GST order under Section 73(9) for failing to provide adequate reasons. The case is remanded for fresh c...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa High Court rules in favor of Krishna Motors, overturning an ex parte tax assessment order. Fresh hearing ordered due to fai...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat HC quashes VAT order and penalty notice against Malani Construction. The court demands detailed reasoning in the fresh ord...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC remands ex-parte order and recovery proceedings in Breakbounce India Pvt Ltd case, granting a new opportunity for adj...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC sets aside GST order for Principle Mahendra Pvt Ltd due to lack of personal hearing; directs reconsideration under Se...
Explore the recent ruling by the Madras High Court in N. Kannammal vs. Assessment Unit, highlighting the petitioner’s challenge against an unjust assessment order under Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 07.12.2022, and the court’s directive for a fresh consideration, emphasizing procedural fairness and natural justice.
In TSN Old Iron Scrap Merchants vs. Deputy Commissioner case, Andhra Pradesh High Court rules non-appearance at GST hearing doesn’t violate natural justice.
Petitioner challenged notice on grounds of violating principles of natural justice, citing vagueness and lack of specificity. Court, echoing its earlier decisions upheld the need for detailed and specific show-cause notices.
Calcutta High Court, highlighted importance of affording an opportunity of hearing as mandated by Section 75(4) of the WBGST/CGST Act. The court emphasized that the absence of compliance with this statutory mandate renders the order unsustainable.
Allahabad High Court’s ruling supported notion that absence of a specified date, time, or venue for personal hearing in notice renders order unsustainable.
R. Soundararajan & Co. challenges GST order in Madras High Court. Notice sent to wrong email, violating natural justice. Detailed analysis of the case and court’s directive.
Court dismisses petitioner’s claim of natural justice violation in tax assessment. Video recording reveals patience during hearing, disproving alleged misconduct.
Explore Delhi High Court judgment on Neelkanth Metals Vs Union of India & Anr., as it sets aside GST Registration cancellation, citing a violation of natural justice.
Kerala High Court affirms faceless proceedings in IT appeal; no natural justice violation as notice sent to CA. Appellant directed to file appeal before ITAT.
Read how Kerala High Court nullifies GST demand in Menacherry Lonappan Jayan vs State Tax Officer case. Ext.P5 order quashed due to violation of natural justice. Detailed analysis included.
