Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad HC criticizes Commercial Tax Dept for not offering personal hearings to assessees, reinforcing the importance of natural...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the significance of personal hearings under GST Section 75(4), backed by judicial precedents, ensuring fairness in assessm...
Fema / RBI : Article explains latest judgement of Indian Apex Court that the RBI's Master Directions on Fraud must adhere to the principles of ...
Corporate Law : A contractual employee is defined under Section 2(b) of The Contract Labor (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 which states that ...
Goods and Services Tax : HC quashed the assessment orders passed by Revenue Department, on the grounds that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the a...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court overturns GST order under Section 73(9) for failing to provide adequate reasons. The case is remanded for fresh c...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa High Court rules in favor of Krishna Motors, overturning an ex parte tax assessment order. Fresh hearing ordered due to fai...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat HC quashes VAT order and penalty notice against Malani Construction. The court demands detailed reasoning in the fresh ord...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC remands ex-parte order and recovery proceedings in Breakbounce India Pvt Ltd case, granting a new opportunity for adj...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC sets aside GST order for Principle Mahendra Pvt Ltd due to lack of personal hearing; directs reconsideration under Se...
In a recent judgement, ITAT Delhi condoned a 379-day delay in the case of Dominic Savio Dasilva Vs CIT, caused due to miscommunication of Income Tax notices by a chartered accountant to a non-resident Indian.
The case of M. Pandidurai Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise in CESTAT Chennai sheds light on the significance of upholding principles of natural justice in tax proceedings, setting a significant legal precedent.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of the Calcutta High Court in the case of Winsome Highrise Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Union of India & Ors. The court quashes the impugned order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for violating principles of natural justice by denying the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing.
Explore the Calcutta High Courts ruling in Paarabhu Dayal Jajoo vs Deputy Commissioner, dismissing a writ petition on grounds of alternative remedy under the GST Act and violation of natural justice principles.
Examine the recent NCLAT Delhi verdict in the UTI Employees Sai Samruddhi Cooperative Housing Society Vs PNB Housing Finance Ltd. & Ors. case, emphasizing the significance of allowing objections in resolution plans.
In K. Marimuthu Vs Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Madras High Court allows an appeal beyond statutory period due to a cancer-related delay.
Delhi High Court sets aside assessment orders due to non-consideration of Ssapp Overseas Pvt Ltd’s request to file a belated reply, citing a violation of natural justice.
The court deemed the show cause notice invalid as it failed to include essential details such as the date, time, and venue of the personal hearing
No penalty under Section 129(3) of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act could be imposed without providing a hearing as prescribed under Section 129(4) of Act.
Delhi High Court held that order passed under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act without dealing with the request for accommodation and according without hearing the petitioner is in violation of principles of nature justice and hence liable to be set aside.
