CA, CS, CMA : From April 1, 2025, businesses with multiple GST registrations must obtain ISD registration to distribute Input Tax Credit (ITC) a...
Goods and Services Tax : Exploring challenges in availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) under GST and relief offered by Notification 183/2023. Understand the impl...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about claiming refunds for excess amounts in your GST Electronic Cash Ledger. Understand the process, requirements, and step...
Goods and Services Tax : Section 34(2) of CGST Act allows a supplier to issue a credit note to adjust the taxable value or tax payable in case of: Post-s...
Goods and Services Tax : The Input Service Distributor (ISD) mechanism under GST enables businesses with multiple branches to centrally receive and allocat...
Goods and Services Tax : KSCAA highlights practical GST challenges in Sec 128A & Sec 16(4), urging clarifications on appeals, ITC, interest waivers, and mu...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn about India's efforts to combat fake ITC frauds, including special drives, legal actions, and GST guidelines for enforcement...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the key recommendations made by the GST Council during its 54th meeting, including changes in GST rates, GoM formations, a...
Goods and Services Tax : Join CA Sachin Jain for a live course on Input Tax Credit from a litigation perspective. Gain practical insights and master ITC co...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC detected Rs. 36,374 crore worth of fake ITC in FY 2023-24 involving 9,190 cases. Key measures and data on ITC fraud detection...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court permits ITC claim under amended GST law, allowing rectification applications for late GSTR-3B filings for FY 2...
Goods and Services Tax : Delhi High Court sets aside GST demand on DLF Home Developers, ruling that the issue will be adjudicated by DGGI. Read details o...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat High Court grants bail to Harsh Vinodbhai Patel in GST fraud case involving ₹22 crore input tax credit. Court cites comp...
Goods and Services Tax : Assessee clarified that Form ST-3 was incorrect as some of the invoices inadvertently remained unaccounted for the said period and...
Goods and Services Tax : Kerala HC rules that availing CGST/SGST credit instead of IGST does not lead to revenue loss. Orders reconsideration of penalty on...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC unveils trade facilitation measures, combats counterfeit currency, and detects ₹80 crore GST fraud. Key developments from I...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarifies ITC eligibility for goods delivered under Ex-Works contract as per Section 16(2)(b) of CGST Act, 2017...
Goods and Services Tax : The circular clarifies that electronic commerce operators under section 9(5) of CGST Act need not reverse input tax credit for spe...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN issues advisory on the new Invoice Management System (IMS) for accepting or rejecting supplier invoices, impacting GSTR-2B an...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC clarifies input tax credit provisions under Section 16(5) & 16(6) of CGST Act, detailing rectification procedures for wrong c...
Utility for compliance of Rule 36(4) – This utility is prepared in view of notification regarding new rule 36(4) and circular no. 123 to determined maximum ITC (B2B) that can be availed while filing GSTR 3B. As per the new rule 36(4) inserted vide Notification No. 49/2019 dated 09th October 2019, a taxpayer can claim […]
On 25th February, 2020, the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Kolkata Zonal Unit (KZU), arrested 02 (two) persons in a case of GST fraud involving Rs. 500 crores of bogus transaction with involvement of GST credit of more than Rs. 96 crores.
Nag Vidarbha Chamber of Commerce has made a Representation and suggestions on few provisions under GST which includes suggestions on provision of Sec. 16(4) of CGST Act 2017 which lays down the condition to take input tax credit by a dealer in books of accounts within a prescribed due time, Levy of Interest under Section […]
Of the above questions on which ruling is sought by the applicant, the question at (2) and (3) relates to utilization of credit availed by the applicant and Q.No. 4 is on reversal of credit availed, which do not fall under any of the category specified under Section 97(2) of the Act and therefore are not within the ambit of this authority.
Considering facts that as per Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017, interest is payable on the delayed payment of tax and that as per the interest statement filed along with the impugned letter, dated 07.02.2020, there was delay in filing GSTR-3B and hence, interest on ‘cash set off’ and ‘ITC set off’ has been calculated and payment thereof has been asked for, recovery of interest against the petitioner, insofar it relates to `I.T.C. set off, shall remain stayed.
Myres Tyre Supply (India) Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) In addition to writ with High Court appellant had also moved an application for refund of the Input Tax Credit (ITC) claimed under the TNVAT Act and this application was without prejudice to their rights under section 140(3) of the TNGST Act. The […]
Rule 86A, inserted vide notification no. 75/2019 – Central Tax dated 26.12.2019 empowers the authority to block the ITC available under electronic credit ledger. As per rule 86A, authorities, if they have reason to believe credit of ITC available in electronic credit ledger has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible, may block the credit available […]
Part-1 GST is new tax and the dealers who followed it from the initial stage have made some technical mistakes which were not noticed by them within time or they were not rectified by the dealers since the facility of revision of such mistakes was not there. These were innocent mistakes and not the fraud […]
This Court does not find any substance in the arguments of the petitioner, when they say that the investigation and the proceedings now initiated is one, which hit by Section 6(2)(1)(b) of the CGST Act of 2017. What has also to be appreciated is the fact that there is a clear distinction between a proceeding drawn for the demand of tax evaded by the petitioner-establishment and the investigation be conducted by the Department of the DG, GST Intelligence Wings in respect of an offence committed by an establishment by way of using bogus and fake invoices and illegally availing ITCs, which the petitioner-establishment otherwise was ineligible.
It appears that petitioner Satnarain had rendered his professional services and assistance for the purpose of incorporation of the firms. At this stage, it cannot be said that he had joined hands with Rajesh Mittal or was beneficiary of any amount other than his professinal fee.
