Income Tax : Analysis of Sections 87A and 115BAC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, detailing their implications for taxpayers, including rebates...
Income Tax : F&O traders need to know how their profits are taxed. With the ITR return filing date approaching, it is imperative to know how st...
Income Tax : Get answers to common ITR issues and FAQs for filing your tax return for AY 2024-25. Resolve filing errors and understand tax regi...
Income Tax : How to calculate the turnover of Futures & Options (F&O) for taxation purposes, including detailed examples and tax filing require...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed with February 2024 legal obligations & updates in India. From Income Tax to GST, understand forms, filing dates, & s...
Income Tax : Discover comprehensive FAQs on filing ITR-4 (Sugam) for AY 2024-25. Learn eligibility criteria, tax regime options, documents need...
Income Tax : Learn who can file ITR-1, who cannot, necessary documents, and precautions. Understand the process of filing ITR-1 (Sahaj) online ...
Income Tax : Understand tax deduction rules for dividends as per Income-tax Act, 1961 amendments. Detailed guide on TDS rates, exemptions, and ...
Income Tax : Read the inaugural address from Ravi Agrawal, the new Chairman of CBDT, outlining his vision for enhancing tax administration in I...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover comprehensive proposals from The Punjab Accountants Association to improve tax compliance, extend filing deadlines, inclu...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and ...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : Assessee was engaged in diamond manufacturing, trading, and windmill power generation, had claimed deductions under sections 35DD ...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court dismisses Income Tax Department's appeal in PCIT Vs Satya Prakash Gupta case, finding no evidence of commission r...
Income Tax : CBDT directs DGIT (Systems) to share income tax information with Telangana's Agriculture Department as per Section 138(1)(a) of th...
Income Tax : Discover the latest Income Tax Act notification under section 138 for Telangana by the Ministry of Finance. Details on the designa...
Income Tax : Explore the latest amendment in the Income Tax Act 1961 by Notification No. 50/2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance. Detailed an...
Income Tax : RBI exempted from Section 206AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, via Ministry of Finance notification dated May 27, 2024. Learn more a...
Income Tax : Get insights on Circular No. 7/2024 issued by CBDT, extending due dates for filing Form No. 10A/10AB under the Income-tax Act, 196...
Section 10B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Export oriented undertaking – Assessment year 2003-04 – Assessee-company was engaged in business of contract research and in providing of laboratory facility to its parent company in USA – It had claimed exemption under section 10B – Assessing Officer observed that assessee was not manufacturing or exporting anything, as it was simply providing services of laboratory
Each of the sub-sections to section 41 deal with different and distinct topics and one cannot read recoupment under one sub-section into another; the depreciation recovered on sale of the capital asset was includible in the total income as balancing charge only under section 41(2); that concept was foreign to the scheme of section 41(1).
Section 254 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Appellate Tribunal – Powers of – Assessment year 1996-97 -Whether though Tribunal is not akin to a Court but functions discharged by it are similar to a Court, and, hence, in addition to its expressed statutory powers it has got inherent power to pass such orders as may be necessary for ends of justice – Held, yes –
Notification No. 117 /2009 – Income Tax In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 117 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby appoints the officer specified in column (2) of the Schedule below to be the Income tax authority as specified in column (3) having his headquarters at the place specified in column (4) of the said Schedule for such jurisdiction as may
The Examination Committee has taken the following important decisions for the November, 2009 examinations. Students are advised to note them carefully. A. CA course being a professional course, practical training is an essential part of it and accordingly all papers of Professional Competence Examination as well as Final should be practical oriented questions as also […]
The Income Tax Act 1961 (the Act) has been amended with effect from 1st October 2009 to provide that any gift-in-kind, being an immovable property or any other property, the value of which exceeds Rs.50,000 (rupees fifty thousand), will become taxable in the hands of the donee, being an individual or a Hindu Undivided Family […]
Notification No. 74/2009 & Notification No. 75/2009 – Income Tax Section 120(1) and (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Jurisdiction of income-tax authorities In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections (1) and (2) of section 120 of the Income-tax Act, 196I (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby directs that Chief Commissioner specified in column (2) of the Schedule below, having his headquarters at the place specified in the corresponding entries in column (3) of the said Schedule, shall exercise the powers and perform the functions in respect of such territorial area
As the facts indicate the holding company has advanced funds to the assessee company in 1998 which was received as share application money, later on transferred to unsecured loan. The amounts were utilised in investments and the incomes thereon were offered under the head ‘capital gains’ and not as ‘business income’.
The application of 15 per cent rate of tax on the amount shown in the return of income would not fall under the category of determination of tax payable on the returned income on the basis of return of income under section 143(1) when the assessee had categorically stated in the note enclosed with the return of income that the returned income was not in the nature of `royalty’
The fact involved in the present case is that the assessee is a branch of Samsung Electronics Co Company Limited, Korea, engaged in the development, manufacture and export of software for use by its parent company, i.e., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Korea. The assessee develops various kinds of software for telecommunication system for office appliances, for computer systems and for mobile devices etc.,. The software developed by the assessee is for in-house use by the parent company.
