Income Tax : Analysis of Sections 87A and 115BAC(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, detailing their implications for taxpayers, including rebates...
Income Tax : F&O traders need to know how their profits are taxed. With the ITR return filing date approaching, it is imperative to know how st...
Income Tax : Get answers to common ITR issues and FAQs for filing your tax return for AY 2024-25. Resolve filing errors and understand tax regi...
Income Tax : How to calculate the turnover of Futures & Options (F&O) for taxation purposes, including detailed examples and tax filing require...
CA, CS, CMA : Stay informed with February 2024 legal obligations & updates in India. From Income Tax to GST, understand forms, filing dates, & s...
Income Tax : Discover comprehensive FAQs on filing ITR-4 (Sugam) for AY 2024-25. Learn eligibility criteria, tax regime options, documents need...
Income Tax : Learn who can file ITR-1, who cannot, necessary documents, and precautions. Understand the process of filing ITR-1 (Sahaj) online ...
Income Tax : Understand tax deduction rules for dividends as per Income-tax Act, 1961 amendments. Detailed guide on TDS rates, exemptions, and ...
Income Tax : Read the inaugural address from Ravi Agrawal, the new Chairman of CBDT, outlining his vision for enhancing tax administration in I...
CA, CS, CMA : Discover comprehensive proposals from The Punjab Accountants Association to improve tax compliance, extend filing deadlines, inclu...
Income Tax : In the case of Anil Champalal Jain vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai), learn why Mumbai ITAT ruled that cash deposits during demonetization alon...
Income Tax : Read the detailed judgment of Bombay High Court in ACIT Vs Sociedade de Fomento Industrial Pvt Ltd regarding TDS deduction on retr...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur quashes PCIT order in Yesh Dagas case, citing violation of natural justice principles. Key points of the judgment and ...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court quashes Income Tax reassessment notice against Deepak Natvarlal Pankhiyani HUF, citing lack of fresh evidence s...
Income Tax : PCIT Vs Farmson Pharmaceuticals Gujarat Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court): Reassessment cannot be solely based on a reevaluation of exi...
Income Tax : CBDT directs DGIT (Systems) to share income tax information with Telangana's Agriculture Department as per Section 138(1)(a) of th...
Income Tax : Discover the latest Income Tax Act notification under section 138 for Telangana by the Ministry of Finance. Details on the designa...
Income Tax : Explore the latest amendment in the Income Tax Act 1961 by Notification No. 50/2024 issued by the Ministry of Finance. Detailed an...
Income Tax : RBI exempted from Section 206AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, via Ministry of Finance notification dated May 27, 2024. Learn more a...
Income Tax : Get insights on Circular No. 7/2024 issued by CBDT, extending due dates for filing Form No. 10A/10AB under the Income-tax Act, 196...
ITAT Delhi held that business promotion expenditure incurred for improving the visibility of the brand and sale of the products is routine expenses incurred during the course of the business. Accordingly, the same is allowable expenditure.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessee (M/s. Cane Development Council Titawi) being a local authority are not chargeable to tax in terms of section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that the assessment order passed against a non-existing company is void ab initio and hence liable to be quashed.
ITAT Delhi held that addition sustained as onus to prove genuineness of the transaction is not proved by the assessee.
ITAT Delhi held that to burden assessee with capital gain arising out of transfer of immovable property or an interest in it, the cost of acquisition is necessarily to be established. Here, cost of acquisition of so called right of preemption is considered as NIL. Hence, computation provisions fail, therefore capital gains could not have been calculated.
ITAT Chennai held that trade payable appearing in the books of accounts duly explained. Accordingly, addition towards the same u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act is unjustified and liable to be deleted.
ITAT Raipur held that addition towards unexplained cash credits u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act sustained as assessee failed to prove the identity and creditworthiness of lenders of unsecured loans.
ITAT Kolkata held that reassessment proceeding initiated in the name of nonexistent amalgamated company is without jurisdiction, void ab initio and is liable to be annulled.
The dividend income received by non-resident individuals, including Foreign Portfolio Investors (FPIs) and Non-Resident Indian citizens (NRIs), is taxable at a rate of 20% without any deductions under the Income-tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that addition towards unexplained expenditure u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act simply on the basis of scribbling note without any other oral/ documentary evidences is unwarranted and unsustainable.
