Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court recent judgment highlights the alarming misuse of the POCSO Act, where cases are filed due to family objections t...
Corporate Law : J&K&L High Court quashes money laundering case against Farooq Abdullah, citing absence of a scheduled offence under the Prevention...
Corporate Law : Jharkhand HC directs the state to use its Special Branch to identify illegal immigrants allegedly from Bangladesh in six districts...
Corporate Law : Punjab & Haryana HC confirms that the Armed Forces Tribunal has jurisdiction to review the legality of a ‘displeasure award’ g...
Corporate Law : Bombay HC rules that relatives of a husband cannot be charged under Section 498A IPC solely for advising a wife to tolerate cruelt...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Company Law : Delhi High Court held that timelines under Regulation 35A of the CIRP Regulations, 2016 for filing avoidance application are direc...
Income Tax : Delhi HC held that the settlement consideration as received was liable to be recognized as capital gains and the same couldn’t p...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that passing of order by the revenue under section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act on the basis of fresh groun...
Income Tax : Telangana High Court held that notice issued u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act must comply with the requirement of the Scheme whether...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that half-hearted approach on the part of AO to make additions on the issue of bogus purchase would not be ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
Delhi HC rules that only the Commissioner has the authority under the CGST Act to order the attachment of a bank account. Details on Vikas Enterprises case.
The judgment by the Gujarat High Court in this case reiterates the principle that parallel investigations on the same subject by different GST authorities can lead to legal complexities. By ordering the transfer of documents to a single investigating unit, the court ensures a streamlined process, emphasizing the need for coherence in legal proceedings.
Orissa High Court recently delved into the complexities of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) through the case of Sekh Aminur Islam Vs Commissioner of CT & GST. The pivotal concern was the GST recovery in the absence of a Second Appellate Tribunal
Highlighting Madras High Court’s verdict on Harees Infotech’s plea for the provisional release of imported goods under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962.
Analysis of Orissa High Court’s directive regarding non-constitution of GSTAT and the tax demand timeframe in Krushna Mohan Dutta Vs Commissioner of CT & GST.
Analysis of B.L. Pahariya Medical Store Vs State of U.P.: Allahabad High Court emphasizes the importance of personal hearing before passing adverse orders.
Delhi High Court held that in terms of section 28(9) of the Customs Act the show cause notice needs to be adjudicated within a period of six months or within one year. Adjudication of notice after expiry of the said period is time-barred.
Delhi High Court rules that GST refund cannot be denied if applications are filed timely and as prescribed, even if there are deficiencies. Read the analysis.
Analysis of Jharkhand HC’s stance on TDS deposits, penalties, and implications on criminal proceedings when deposits are made with interest.
Analysis of Bombay HC ruling in Naroli Resorts vs ACIT on reopening tax assessment after four years. Did the assessee disclose all material facts?
