Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Income Tax : The Delhi High Court quashed a tax reassessment notice issued to Indus Towers Ltd. for AY 2009-10, citing procedural lapses and mi...
Income Tax : Gujarat High Court rules that a jurisdictional assessing officer cannot override the faceless assessment scheme under Section 151A...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidates GST assessment order due to lack of an official signature and DIN, citing Supreme Court and ...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat High Court rules in favor of Gujarat State Police Housing Corp, allowing a GST refund despite exceeding the two-year statu...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that the Baggage Rules would have limited application to foreign nationals and as jewellery is part of perso...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
In the Neena Uppal Vs Union of India case, Bombay High Court rules against Customs Department’s refusal to clear goods, citing lack of conformity to CAAR opinion.
Allahabad High Court held that provisions of section 50(2) of PMLA Act empowers Directorate of Enforcement to summon any person whose attendance he considers necessary whether to give evidence or to produce any records during the course of any investigation/ proceeding.
Madras High Court held that reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on a grossly erroneous factual foundation and also based on mechanically granted approval is untenable in law.
Bombay High Court ruling states no writ jurisdiction on claims of GST department coercion for tax deposits, citing lack of evidence and voluntary action. Full judgment analysis.
Read about the Madras High Court’s decision to quash an Income Tax assessment order issued while objections were pending before the Dispute Resolution Panel.
Delhi High Court directs re-adjudication in Electra Power Transmission Systems vs Commissioner GST case due to petitioner’s failure to upload necessary documents, allowing two weeks for submission.
Madras High Court held that CBDT Circular no. 6 of 2023 dated 24.05.2023 giving differential treatment by not extending time for filing application to new trust having provisional approval u/s. 80G is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
The High Court scrutinized the case, highlighting flaws in the order’s reasoning. It emphasized that the petitioner’s reply was comprehensive and should have been evaluated on its merits. The court found the decision lacking in thoroughness, as the officer failed to seek clarification or additional documents before dismissing the reply as unsatisfactory.
Delhi High Court mandates disposal of GST cancellation applications within four weeks, addressing delays in processing. Read the full judgment here.
Read about the Madras High Court’s decision in Rangaswamy Jeevanantham vs Superintendent case, where GST liability and TDS on Salary deduction under section 194H were disputed, leading to an order for a statutory appeal.
