Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Delhi HC ruled WGF Financial Services can't claim bad debt deduction under Sec. 36(1)(vii) as furnishing guarantees wasn't its reg...
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidates GST assessment order due to lack of an official signature and DIN, citing Supreme Court and ...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat High Court rules in favor of Gujarat State Police Housing Corp, allowing a GST refund despite exceeding the two-year statu...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that the Baggage Rules would have limited application to foreign nationals and as jewellery is part of perso...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that passing of ex-parte order without affording a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee is...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment without fresh tangible material based upon mere change of opinion is unsustain...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Bombay High Court releases minor in Pune Porsche case, setting aside JJB’s remand orders, emphasizes law adherence despite public outcry. Justice prevails.
Explore the Bombay High Court judgment in Sanjeev Suresh Desai Vs Union of India. Analysis of refund application rejection and remand for denovo consideration.
Explore the detailed judgment of Nitco Paints Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India by the Bombay High Court. Learn about the case background, analysis, and implications.
Allahabad High Court rules that tax liability quantification cannot be done under Section 130 of the GST Act, setting aside an ex parte order.
Commissioner of Customs vs Disha Tulsiani: Allahabad High Court dismisses revenue appeals over confiscation of 3.5 kg gold bars under Customs Act, citing low monetary limits.
Karvy Innotech Limited Vs State of Maharashtra: Bombay HC Quashes MVAT Order passed after expiry of four years from the end of the year containing period to which return relates
Bombay HC upholds Rs. 71.88 lakh entertainment duty for APSARA Awards while deleting Rs. 71.88 lakh penalty. Key points and detailed analysis of the judgment.
The court held that while the information prompting the notice must be disclosed to the assessee, the detailed material or evidence need not be supplied at the initial stage. The court emphasized that Section 148A aims to provide a preliminary opportunity to the assessee, ensuring that reassessment proceedings are not initiated arbitrarily or without sufficient basis.
Read the Kerala High Court judgment on income tax assessments involving Sunny Jacob Jewellers. Analysis includes AO’s authority under Section 153A, impact of incriminating materials, and appellate decisions.
The Bombay High Court releases a minor accused in the Pune Porsche accident case, ruling the Juvenile Justice Board’s remand orders illegal.
