Sponsored
    Follow Us:

high court judgments

Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.

Latest Articles


GST में Voluntary Payment या Coercion? Karnataka HC का फैसला

Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC ने DGGI की ₹2.5 करोड़ की वसूली को अवैध ठहराया। जान...

March 11, 2025 471 Views 0 comment Print

Analysis of Notifications and Circulars for Week ending 9th March 2025

CA, CS, CMA : Key tax & legal updates from 3rd-9th Mar 2025: Income tax exemptions, GST rulings, RBI liquidity measures, IBC cases, and Supreme ...

March 10, 2025 3324 Views 0 comment Print

Top 5 Income Tax Rulings of February 2025

Income Tax : Explore February 2025's key income tax rulings covering issues like R&D deductions, secondment taxability, trust exemptions, and d...

March 8, 2025 1092 Views 0 comment Print

GST Case Law Compendium- February 2025 Edition

Goods and Services Tax : February 2025 GST Case Law Compendium covers significant High Court and Supreme Court judgments on key GST issues. Orders issued u...

March 6, 2025 11337 Views 1 comment Print

Landmark Civil Cases in India: Key Judgments & Impact

Corporate Law : Explore key landmark civil cases in India, including their legal impact on constitutional rights, reservations, governance, and wo...

March 5, 2025 798 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


Latest Case Law Related to IBC 2016: October to December 2024

Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...

February 13, 2025 489 Views 0 comment Print

Latest Case Law Related to IBC – April to June 2024

Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...

August 14, 2024 774 Views 0 comment Print

GST payable on interest component of EMI of Credit Card loan: Calcutta HC

Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...

August 10, 2022 3096 Views 0 comment Print

Gurugugram CA arrest by GST Dept. – Submission by Dept. in Court

Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...

May 25, 2022 90432 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi HC Issues Practice Directions to Dispense with Physical Signatures on Daily Court Orders

Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...

April 29, 2022 933 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Reimbursement of Salaries to Seconded Employees Does Not Constitute FTS

Corporate Law : Karnataka HC upholds Flipkart's stance on TDS under Section 195, ruling seconded employees' salaries as reimbursements, not taxabl...

March 16, 2025 357 Views 0 comment Print

Section 56(2)(viib) Not Applicable to Share premium Transactions Between Holding & Wholly-Owned Subsidiary

Income Tax : Delhi High Court sets aside DRP's order in FIS Payment case, directing a fresh review under ITAT rulings on Section 56(2)(viib). K...

March 16, 2025 99 Views 0 comment Print

Non-adjudication of notice for about 15 years due to repeated placing in call book not justified

Custom Duty : Delhi High Court held that repeated placing and removing from call books is not a valid justification for non-adjudication of show...

March 15, 2025 120 Views 0 comment Print

GST Registration Can’t Be Cancelled Retrospectively without clear notice: Delhi HC

Goods and Services Tax : Mohit Enterprises Vs Commissioner of State GST And Vat Department of Trade And Taxes Delhi (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court, in...

March 15, 2025 354 Views 0 comment Print

Seizure of goods based on undervaluation justifiable: Allahabad HC

Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court dismissed the writ petition and held that seizure of goods under section 129 of the IGST/ CGST Act can be don...

March 15, 2025 552 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Bombay High Court Enforces Video Conferencing Rules

Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...

December 19, 2024 594 Views 0 comment Print

CBDT Revises Monetary Limits for Tax Income Tax Appeals

Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...

September 17, 2024 11802 Views 0 comment Print

New Video Conferencing Protocols Issued by Delhi High Court

Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...

May 20, 2024 1215 Views 0 comment Print

Instructions for AO after Adverse observations of Allahabad HC

Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...

August 7, 2022 12285 Views 2 comments Print

Delhi HC exempts lawyers from wearing gowns

Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...

February 25, 2022 3267 Views 0 comment Print


Additional Income-Tax Officer vs Ponkunnam Traders (Kerala High Court)

February 12, 1973 1330 Views 0 comment Print

The appellants are the Additional Income-tax Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (the revenue); and the respondent, Ponkunnam Traders, a firm, is the assessee. The judgment under appeal is reported as Ponkunnam Traders v. Addl. Income-tax Officer, Kottayam, [1972] 83 ITR 508 (Ker). Since the question involved is fairly simple,

ITO must estimate Income on fair basis and not arbitrarily if Assessee not maintained sufficient books of account

January 19, 1967 1911 Views 0 comment Print

Badrinath Agarwal v. CIT (Allahabad High Court) 65 ITR 242 (All. ) In estimating the income the conditions of trade obtaining and the average margin of profit in the particular line of business are to be borne in mind. It is clear that these factors in the present case have been kept in view and, therefore, it is not possible to say that the estimate of income was arbitrary or capricious to justify holding that some error of law had been committed by the Tribunal in confirming the flat rate of 5% applied by the departmental authorities

CIT vs Parbutty Churn Law (Calcutta High Court)

June 12, 1964 1003 Views 0 comment Print

Under Income-tax Act the annual value of the property is to be taken as a sum which the property might reasonably be expected to fetch. The annual value is no doubt a hypothetical sum. But what is to be taken into consideration is the whole of the consideration which the landlord receives from the tenant for his right to use and occupy the property.

Gemini Pictures Circuit Ltd. V. CIT (Madras High Court) 33 ITR 547 ( Mad.)

December 6, 1957 2085 Views 0 comment Print

The question arising for consideration both in the reference under section 66(2) of the Indian Income-tax Act as well as in W.P. No. 925 of 1955 are identical and relate to the proper rule to be applied for determining the amortisation of films for computing the income, profits and gains of the assessee which is carrying on business as a film distributor. The assessee in the Reference Case No. 27 of 1955 is the petitioner in the writ petition.

Income estimate by applying a flat rate can be fair if AO exercises his judgment reasonably and not arbitrarily

December 9, 1948 2873 Views 0 comment Print

CIT v. S Sen & Others (Orissa High Court) 17 ITR 355 (Orissa) The proceeding arises out of two application consolidated because of the facts being identical, by the Commissioner of Income-tax/Excess profits Tax, Bihar and Orissa, under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act read with Section 21 of the Excess profits tax Act for the stating a case and a case stated for the opinion of this Court on the following three question of law :-

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31