Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : Kerala HC rules police must assess both sides in sexual assault cases, warning against treating complaints as absolute truth. ...
Income Tax : Bombay High Court, in Chamber of Tax Consultants v. Director General of Income Tax (Systems) (2025), ruled that flaws in the ITR u...
Corporate Law : Karnataka HC quashed a case against Arnab Goswami, calling it reckless and baseless. The court noted misuse of Section 505(2) IPC ...
Income Tax : Telangana HC clarified that capital gains tax applies only when ownership or possession is transferred along with consideration....
Corporate Law : Orissa High Court's landmark decision quashes rape charges against a man accused of sex on false promise of marriage, emphasizing ...
Corporate Law : Key IBC case law updates from Oct-Dec 2024, covering Supreme Court and High Court decisions on CoC powers, resolution plans, relat...
Corporate Law : SC rules on Special Court jurisdiction; NCLAT redefines financial debt; HC upholds IBBI regulations and addresses various insolven...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court permits ITC claim under amended GST law, allowing rectification applications for late GSTR-3B filings for FY 2...
Corporate Law : Delhi HC lays down guidelines for regulated smartphone use in schools, balancing safety with misuse prevention. Full details on pr...
Goods and Services Tax : Calcutta High Court rules in favor of an exporter, overturning a GST refund rejection due to portal issues, citing natural justice...
Goods and Services Tax : Allahabad High Court quashes GST demand for interest & penalty, ruling Section 74 inapplicable due to lack of fraud or suppression...
Corporate Law : Chhattisgarh High Court held that involvement of accused and illegal coal levy matter is prima facie proved and the applicant is u...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Madras High Court directs the State Tax Officer to resolve rectification applications under GST Section 161 within three months, ensuring compliance with legal time limits.
Madras High Court held that passing of ex-parte order prematurely before expiry of time limit for filing reply and without granting personal hearing is against the principle of natural justice and accordingly the order is set aside.
Kerala High Court held that imposition of tax/penalty under section 129 of the CGST / SGST Act in case of only minor discrepancies unjustified. Penalty can be imposed only for violations which may lead to evasion of tax.
Some workmen had continued with IIT-Bombay through multiple contractors, therefore, for the limited purpose of payment of gratuity, Respondents were required to be treated as employee of IIT-Bombay.
This was followed by summons issued u/s. 70 of the CGST Act leading to the recording of certain statements. Certain records were also produced before the Central Authority.
Bombay High Court held that department cannot deny the benefits of accrued Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the sole ground that GST ITC 02 was filed manually and not electronically. Thus, relevant show cause notice quashed.
The petitioner partnership is a dealer in gold and diamond jewellery in Mumbai and registered as such under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act and the Central Sales Tax Act.
Where assessee was able to demonstrate that the transaction was included in the GSTR-1 Return as a zero-rated sale, the goods detained under Section 129(3) should be released provisionally.
Delhi High Court permits submission of documents within a week to support the GST registration status amid proposed cancellation.
Madras High Court sets aside order in Krith Enterprises case, citing lack of adequate personal hearing and directs reconsideration by tax authorities.
