Understand the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and its impact on businesses. Learn about GST rates, compliance requirements, and its role in simplifying taxation. Stay updated with the latest GST news and updates.
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that ITC on GIDC charges is allowable where no construction is involved. It also held that Section 74 proceedings ...
CA, CS, CMA : The update discusses GST rulings on ITC and refunds, income tax relief interpretations, and insolvency reforms. It also covers dis...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that recovery cannot proceed against a legal heir without determining liability under Section 93, reinforcing due p...
Goods and Services Tax : The comparison shows how large-scale frauds go undetected for years while professionals face immediate coercive action. Courts hav...
Goods and Services Tax : The law prohibits all real-money online games regardless of skill, marking a major shift from earlier legal precedents and reshapi...
Goods and Services Tax : The representation highlights ambiguity in whether the ₹2.5 crore ITC threshold should be annual or cumulative. It emphasizes th...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights str...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : The case highlights that summons lacking details of the underlying inquiry violate procedural fairness. It underscores the need fo...
Goods and Services Tax : CBI arrested GST officials for demanding a bribe to facilitate registration approval. The case highlights strict enforcement again...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that an adjudication order passed without considering the taxpayer’s reply is unsustainable. It remitted the matt...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court held that a single show cause notice covering multiple assessment years is not legally sustainable. Authorities were per...
Goods and Services Tax : The ruling highlights that ignoring a taxpayer’s additional reply and request for hearing renders the order unsustainable. The c...
Goods and Services Tax : The court held that the revised 18% GST rate is applicable, but deferred recovery of the 6% differential tax as reimbursement from...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court removed the requirement to verify “authorized operations” for earlier transactions, holding that the condition was i...
Goods and Services Tax : The GST portal launches an Excel-based IMS Offline Tool to help taxpayers efficiently manage and process invoices. It enables bulk...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC extends due date for filing March 2026 GSTR-3B to April 21, 2026, for registered persons under Section 39 of the CGST Act....
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN clarified that system-calculated interest for February 2026 was incorrectly reflected in March returns due to a technical iss...
Goods and Services Tax : GSTN has enabled editing of the pre-deposit percentage in APL-01 filings. The change allows taxpayers flexibility, while verificat...
Goods and Services Tax : Taxpayers faced issues filing appeals where adjudication orders showed zero demand. GSTN clarified that such system limitations re...
Sonal Automation Industries Vs State of Uttarakhand (Uttarakhand High Court) The penalty order was passed due to inadvertent mistake i.e. invoice number stated as 235 in place of SAI/V/235. The writ petition was allowed and penalty order was quashed. The imposition of the penal consequences due to an exception, which has been caused on account […]
Can voluntary payment of GST penalty affect your right to appeal? Find out how Section 129 and 130 of the CGST Act, 2017 play a role.
Satguru Impex Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) The petitioner made mistakes in the e-way bill in the names of buyers and sellers. In place of buyer’s name, seller name was filled and in place of seller’s name, buyer name was filled. The mistake was rectified by generating fresh e-way bill. The GST departments […]
Progressive Enterprise Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) The goods were sent form Guwahati to Tripura. Due to some reasons goods were not unloaded and the petitioner sought to take back the goods to Guwahati. The Driver stated to the concern inspector that he is waiting for the fresh tax invoices and e-way bills […]
Tarmal Industrial Supply Company Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) Non-speaking order – the show cause notice issued prior to passing of the impugned order does not stipulate even basic details such as the date and time of hearing – the requirement of passing a speaking order has been entirely frustrated in so far […]
Messrs Tanay Creation Through Prop. Tanay Mahavir Shah Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The petitioner put the case before the Hon’ble Court that no opportunity was given before passing the order under section 129 and 130. The notices were served upon the truck driver instead of owner of the goods or owner of […]
Rimi Sales Agency Vs Union of India (Tripura High Court) Show-cause notice was issued on 06.11.2018 which required the petitioner to appear before the said authority on 23.11.2018. Without permitting the petitioner to appear and file reply and oppose the demands the Inspector confirmed the demand by passing separate orders on 06.11.2018. This was wholly […]
Tirthamoyee Aluminium Products Vs State of Tripura (Tripura High Court) Due to a clerical error in the e-way Bill the distance from the place of origin to the destination was shown as 470 Kms. instead of actual distance of 1470 Kms. There is no dispute that the goods were sold by way of inter-state sale […]
The Court held that it being an inter-State transfer of goods there was no requirement of carrying the U.P. State e-way bill – the insistence by the State authorities that the petitioner’s vehicle was not carrying the U.P. E-way bill is without any factual and legal basis
A.S. Enterprise Vs Commissioner of State Tax U.P. (Allahabad High court) The petitioner’s case was that the petitioner could not produce relevant documents at the time of inspection of goods in transit. The same (all documents) were produced at the time of physical verification. The authority declined to verify the same. The detaining authority formed […]
