Service Tax : Understand the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Vishal Tansukhbhai Gohel vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST. No service tax on freig...
Service Tax : CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Shakti Enterprise vs Commissioner of Central Excise & ST clarifies that CHA's reimbursable expenses are...
Custom Duty : CESTAT, Allahabad penalizes Commissioner for delaying Tribunal order implementation. Rs. 2,00,000 penalty imposed, and contempt pr...
Service Tax : Dive into the legal battle over corporate guarantees' taxability as Business Auxiliary Service. Explore the CESTAT's decision, the...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Bangalore's ruling in case of Rafeek K.T. v. Commissioner of Customs, emphasizing need for substantial evidence to impose p...
CA, CS, CMA : CESTAT e-Filing Software User Manual explains about New User Registration, User Home Page Navigation, Filing, (Petition/Appeal) ...
Goods and Services Tax : This is the fourth year since the introduction of GST in July, 2017. Despite a sizeable liquidation of appeals under the Sabka Vis...
Excise Duty : The Union Cabinet today gave its approval for setting up six additional Benches of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate T...
Service Tax : The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has directed JetLite (formerly Sahara Airlines Ltd) to pay Rs 100 crore (Rs 1...
Excise Duty : RECENTLY the President of India was pleased to discharge Hon'ble member of the CESTAT Mr. PK Das, just a day before he was to comp...
Service Tax : In Topaz Service Corporation Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi), it was ruled that Erection, Commissioning and Installation Se...
Service Tax : CESTAT Delhi held that granting “call option” is not an activity of rendering service. Thus, appellant has wrongly been held t...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty and revocation of customs broker license justified as customs broker abetted the ille...
Custom Duty : CESTAT Chennai rejection of refund claim merely for non-mentioning of period particulars in CA’s certificate unjustifiable as re...
Service Tax : Oceanic Consultants Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner or Central Excise And Service Tax (CESTAT Chandigarh) CESTAT Chandigarh held that Indi...
Custom Duty : Read Notification No. 02/2023 from CESTAT, New Delhi, introducing virtual hearings. Learn about the procedure, technical requireme...
Goods and Services Tax : Applications are being invited for 2 anticipated vacancies of Member (Technical) and 4 anticipated vacancies of Member (Judicial) ...
CA, CS, CMA : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations requesting for physical hearing of appeals. As there is improvement i...
Custom Duty : F No. 01(05)/Circular/CESTAT/2021 Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal West Block No. 2, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-11006...
Goods and Services Tax : Representations have been received from the Bar Associations at Mumbai, Bangalore, Ahmedabad, Chandigarh and Hyderabad Benches of ...
Whether Service tax levy is sustainable in respect of discounts/incentives received by the Advertising agency from the print/broadcast media in respect of advertisements placed by the said agencies on behalf of customers
Roshan R Jaiswal (the Appellant) is a distributor for BSNL Prepaid Cellular services etc., and was registered with Service Tax Department under the category of ‘Franchise service’. Pursuant to issue of Show Cause Notice dated October 16, 2008, which was adjudicated vide Order-in-Original
Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.(the Appellant) filed shipping bills for re-export of various machineries (impugned goods) imported for exploration purposes and claimed Drawback of the duty paid at the time of import.
AD Refund cannot be denied when no endorsement to the effect that ‘No Cenvat credit of SAD is admissible’ is made on an invoice issued to the non-registered buyer as no credit is available to the buyer on account of non-registration
Cummins Diesel Sales & Services India Limited (the Appellant) is a manufacturer of the dutiable final products. In this respect, the Appellant had procured certain goods from Amul Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Amul) on payment of duty and availed the Cenvat credit on the same.
Antony Garages Pvt. Ltd. (the Assessee) was engaged in manufacturing of body building of buses, trucks etc. and also undertook repair, maintenance and servicing of commercial vehicles. Tata Motors Ltd. (TML) sent vehicles, after manufacturing, to the Assessee under a works order
Jai Corporation Ltd. (the Appellant) is engaged in the manufacture of synthetic blended/spun yarn falling under Chapter sub heading 55095100 and 55092100 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.
The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue before the Hon’ble CESTAT, Ahmadabad in terms of the Review Order No.R-02/2008, dated January 08, 2007 (the Review Order)signed by the Chief Commissioner of Central Excise
Emitec Emission Control Tech. (I) Pvt. Ltd. (the Appellant) imported certain goods from Emitec Gesellschaft Fur Emissions technologie GmBH (EGM Germany) which is the parent company of the Appellant.
Chowgule & Company Pvt. Ltd (the Appellant) are the traders who, imported goods by discharging Special Additional Duty of Customs (SAD)under Section 3(5) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and subsequently domestically sold such goods on payment of CST/VAT
