Corporate Law : Explore intersection of competition law and telecom regulation, focusing on abuse of dominance and jurisdictional conflicts betwee...
Corporate Law : Learn how the Competition Commission of India determines dominant positions of entities by considering various factors, as outline...
Corporate Law : Explore the intricate interplay between competition law and sustainability, unraveling conflicts, costs, and consumer welfare impl...
Corporate Law : Explore FAQs on the Lesser Penalty Regime by the Competition Commission of India. Learn about benefits, application process, and p...
Corporate Law : Explore the foundation and functioning of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) under the Competition Act, 2002. Understand it...
Corporate Law : Explore proposed amendments to the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations, 2009, analyzing their impact and implica...
Corporate Law : Explore the proposed amendments to Regulations 35, 37, and 50 of the Competition Commission of India (General) Regulations 2009. L...
Corporate Law : Explore the Ministry of Corporate Affairs draft policy for pre-legislative consultation and a comprehensive review of rules and re...
Corporate Law : The Competition Commission of India (CCI) seeks feedback on the draft regulations for determining turnover or income. Share your c...
Corporate Law : Stay informed on the latest CCI (General) Regulation amendments for Interlocutory Applications. Learn about numbering, fees, and s...
Goods and Services Tax : Detailed analysis of Competition Commission of India's order regarding Cinema Ventures Pvt Ltd not passing GST rate reduction bene...
Goods and Services Tax : The average base price of tickets sold before and after the GST rate reduction was compared. The DGAP found that the company had n...
Corporate Law : Learn about CCI's decision that extended car delivery times do not merit antitrust scrutiny, analyzed in the Balbir Singh Nagpal V...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the DGAP report on GST rate reduction impact on movie ticket prices, alleged profiteering by the respondent, detailed inve...
Corporate Law : It has been alleged that Google is granting exclusive access to Truecaller to share private contact information of the users with ...
Corporate Law : Explore the amendments to the Competition Commission of India (CCI) regulations in 2024, enhancing transparency and procedures. Un...
Corporate Law : Discover the Competition Commission of Indias in-depth study on AI's impact on competition, efficiency, and innovation. Get insigh...
Corporate Law : Competition Commission of India announces new regulations and penalty guidelines to streamline competition law enforcement. Read m...
Corporate Law : Delve into the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) regulations on determining turnover or income, exploring amendments, stakeh...
Corporate Law : Explore the Competition Commission of India (Settlement) Regulations, 2024. Learn about the settlement process, changes, and its i...
There was nothing to show that unfair pricing was done by Microsoft in selling identical licence at different prices. No evidence was brought. The respondent was not tying its OEM with new computers. The purchase of personal computer has the choice to have the programme of Microsoft Office or Words getting installed in its computer if he so chooses. This cannot be, therefore, an example of tying up. There was no compulsion on the appellant to purchase Microsoft software to purchase the computers only as the OEM licensee was free to sell their product, i.e., personal computer even without the warranty that would clearly end the argument about the tying up.
Considering the Section and its language plainly, it is apparent that the agreement to allow concessions and benefits including allowances, discounts, rebates or credit have to have a nexus with the dealings of the respondent. The said dealings would not cover a uniform policy by the respondent to sell its product. We agree with Shri Makheeja when he says that if there is a discrimination between authorized dealers inter se, it would amount to a restrictive trade practice but in that case, it will be that the dealing of the respondent with a particular dealer was discriminatory in comparison to its dealing with another dealer. Such is not the case here.
Director General had concluded on the basis of his investigation that it was not proved that foreign airlines hold about 90% market share in the relevant market of international flying to and fro from India. The appellant was unable to give any specific statistics before the CCI or even before us. On the other hand, from the documents on record
As per the information available in public domain, it is clear that the OP was not the only real estate developer offering commercial office space in Delhi. There are other real estate developers as well, e.g., Ansal API, Unitech, BPTP, Omaxe, Parsavnath etc.Presence of other real estate developers offering commercial office space also indicates that the informant was not dependent upon the opposite party for provisioning of an office space.
By the statutory provision, the legislature has authorized the Central Government to classify and revise rates/freight with respect to carriage of passenger and goods. The impugned rate instructions/circulars issued by OP were uniformly applicable for all the entities who wanted to avail the services of Indian railways for transporting their goods.
Section 12B was introduced in the MRTP Act by Act 30 of the 1984 as an independent remedy for a claimant in addition to a suit that he may file to claim any loss or damage that he may suffer by reason of any monopolistic or restrictive or unfair trade practice as would be clear from sub-section (4) of section 12B. There is no reference at all in section 12B of the MRTP Act to the provisions of either section 10
The Competition Commission of India has held that there is no contravention of the provisions of the Act by the alleged agreement between Yash Raj Films Private Limited and its various associated enterprises. The Competition Commission of India passed its order in the case filed by Ajay Devgn Films against Yash Raj Films Private Limited.
GAL is not enjoying the position of dominance in the relevant market on any of the parameters and factors given in section 19(4). GAL is not found to be in a dominant position in terms of the market share, market structure, size and resources, dependence of consumers etc. Thus, when the GAL is not in a dominant position in the relevant market the question of abuse of its dominance does not arise. Therefore, in the instant matter, no case of violation of provisions of section 4 is made out.
a. In the appointment of stockists by way of issue of ‘NOC’ and regulating the number of stockists in contravention of Section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002. b. In preventing and restricting the retailers from allowing discounts to the consumers in contravention of Section 3(3)(a) of the Competition Act, 2002. As mentioned earlier a suo motto investigation be initiated into the nexus between associations both horizontal and vertical for as observed most of the practices have evolved over several decades. In fact, association in the pharma industry associations have impacted on several activities along the value chain.
The Competition Commission of India has found Fast Way Group abusing its dominance in the cable TV service in the territory of Punjab and Chandigarh in violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002. The order was passed pursuant to investigation carried out by the Director General upon information filed by M/s Kansan News Private Limited a broadcaster of a news and current affairs TV channel known as ‘Day and Night News’ and operating in the states of Punjab, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh and Union Territory of Chandigarh.
