Goods and Services Tax : Limitation start from date when Impugned Order in Form DRC 07 uploaded on portal and not from date of detailed order: Allahabad Hi...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue was denial of ITC transfer due to different State registrations of entities. The Court ruled that no such restriction ex...
Goods and Services Tax : The Court ruled that interest cannot be imposed in adjudication if it was not specified in the show cause notice. The decision rei...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved taxation of intermediary services based on supplier location. The amendment shifts place of supply to recipient...
Goods and Services Tax : Failure to serve notices at the updated registered address invalidates GST proceedings. The Court emphasized strict adherence to p...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore Supreme Court's scrutiny of whether supplying cranes for services like loading, unloading, lifting, and shifting qualifies...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Goods and Services Tax : The court examined whether tax paid during investigation can be treated as voluntary. It ruled that authorities must investigate c...
Goods and Services Tax : The case addressed denial of refund of VAT pre-deposit made through ITC. The Court held that Section 142(6) mandates cash refund a...
Goods and Services Tax : Gauhati High Court rules GSTR-1 vs GSTR-3B mismatch from clerical errors cannot trigger automatic tax recovery without Rule 88C pr...
Goods and Services Tax : India cuts excise duty on petrol and diesel to offset global oil price surge amid war. Move aims to reduce fuel costs, curb inflat...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved inability to access documents leading to ex parte assessment. The Court granted interim relief by reducing the ...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
The Tribunal held that GST-related claims not included in an approved insolvency resolution plan lapse, protecting the resolution applicant from past, unquantified liabilities.
The High Court ruled that Section 74’s extended limitation cannot apply unless wilful suppression with intent to evade tax is proved, quashing the notice where facts were already known to the Revenue.
The Supreme Court upheld the Delhi High Court ruling that a single SCN covering multiple financial years is valid in cases of fraudulent ITC. The decision confirms that fraud investigations spanning several years can be dealt with through consolidated proceedings.
The Supreme Court held that a show cause notice invoking Section 74 must clearly spell out fraud or suppression. Mere figures without supporting particulars were found insufficient at a prima facie stage.
The Supreme Court held that leasing residential property for use as a student or working-professional hostel qualifies for GST exemption. The ruling confirms that long-term residential use, not the lessee’s personal occupation, is decisive.
The Court held that presumptions under Sections 132(4A) and 292C of the Income Tax Act apply only to income-tax proceedings. GST authorities must independently assess evidence without borrowing statutory presumptions from another law.
The issue was whether ITC could be recovered from a bona fide recipient without first proceeding against the supplier. The key takeaway is that statutory procedure under Section 42 must be followed before reversing ITC.
The court held that ITC disclosed in the annual return cannot be rejected solely because it was missed in monthly returns. Appellate authorities must give clear reasons before denying such claims.
The court ruled that exporters making zero-rated supplies can claim refund of unutilized ITC even if suppliers ignored deemed export procedures. Refund cannot be denied when deemed export benefits were never availed.
The Court held that duty-paid items supplied directly to site are not includible when the final plant is immovable. The key takeaway is that excisability, not contract value, governs valuation.
