Goods and Services Tax : Chronological analysis of GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) formation and time limits for filing appeals following the President's ap...
Goods and Services Tax : Understand the implications of the Tamil Nadu AAR ruling on Input Tax Credit (ITC) for construction of immovable property for comm...
Goods and Services Tax : Learn how the Gujarat High Court ruling affects GST exemption for solid waste management services provided to Notified Area Author...
Goods and Services Tax : The AAR Rajasthan in the case of In Re. Shri Digamber Jain Sidhkut Chaityalaya Temple Trust [Advance Ruling No. RAJ/AAR/2023-24/22...
Goods and Services Tax : Read the Karnataka AAR ruling on Changejar Technologies' status as an e-commerce operator, implications for digital gold sales, an...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the case of Pradeep Kanthed v. Union of India where the Supreme Court issues notice to the Finance Ministry regarding the ...
Goods and Services Tax : Commissioner of Central Goods And Service Tax & Ors Vs Safari Retreats Private Limited & Ors (Supreme Court of India) The ...
Goods and Services Tax : The 45th meeting of Goods and Services Tax Council (“GST Council”) is scheduled to be held on September 17, 2021. The Ministry...
Custom Duty, Income Tax : The Karnataka High Court in M/s Pellagic Food Ingredients Private Ltd. v. Union of India [Writ Petition No. 14737/2021[T-CUS] issu...
Goods and Services Tax : AIMTPA – All India MSME and Tax Professionals Association has invited two GST Experts on it’s Platform on 24th July 2021 and a...
Goods and Services Tax : Uttarakhand High Court rules in favor of Subhash Singh, modifying assessment orders and rejecting denial of ITC due to supplier's ...
Goods and Services Tax : Rajasthan High Court rules that a writ petition against an assessment order is not maintainable if the appeal remedy is not availe...
Goods and Services Tax : Stay informed about the Supreme Court's notice on a High Court judgment regarding GST on development rights transfer in real estat...
Goods and Services Tax : Orissa High Court rules on appeal rights of BPD Steel Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. in a case concerning non-constitution of an Arbitral Tri...
Service Tax : Delhi High Court issues notice in the case of M/s Payworld Digital Services Pvt. Ltd. where Show Cause Notice (SCN) was adjudicate...
Excise Duty : Notification No. 32/2015-Central Excise Dated- 4th June, 2015 Ethanol produced from molasses generated from cane crushed in the ...
Service Tax : Circular No. 184/3/2015-ST Dated the 3rd June, 2015 It is further clarified that exemption from service tax still continues to ser...
Custom Duty : the floods in the State of Jammu and Kashmir (the State) from whole of the duty as specified under the First Schedule and whole of...
Excise Duty : Grants exemption from Basic Excise Duty to goods donated or purchased out of cash donations for the relief and rehabilitation of p...
Custom Duty : New posts have been created in the rank of Commissioners of Customs in DRI and DGCEI for adjudication of cases as investigated by ...
Madurai Kamaraj University Vs Joint Commissioner (Madras High Court) In Madurai Kamaraj University v. Joint Commissioner GST and Central Excise [W.P.(MD) No.20502 of 2019 and W.M.P.(MD) No.17152 of 2019 dated August 16, 2021], Madurai Kamaraj University (the Petitioner) has sought for a writ of Certiorari for quashing of the records on the file of Joint […]
The Appellant failing to pay its Service Tax Liability under RCM in a stipulated time but shown as liability in the Service tax Return under the Finance Act, 1994, which was repealed and was replaced by the Goods and Services Tax
Rambabu Singh Vs State of Bihar (Patna High Court) Rambabu Singh (the Petitioner) filed the petitions to quash- two orders dated February 03, 2020; two order dated March 05, 2020 and one order dated December 28, 2020 (the Orders) passed by Additional Commissioner of State Tax (the Respondent) as the Orders were passed ex-parte and […]
Tribunal opined that the alleged non-payment cannot be called as willful or intentional act of the appellant to evade the payment of duty. Lastly, it was adjudged that it is the burden of the Revenue to prove whether the Assessee has intended to conduct evasion.
Sainath Rajkumar Sarode And Others Vs State of Maharashtra And Others (Bombay High Court) Sainath Rajkumar Sarode (Petitioner) has been filed seeking directions for the recovery of arrears due to the Petitioners under a Recovery Warrant dated October 15, 2018 passed by the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority against Respondent Nos. 4 to 7. In […]
In Ravi Parthasarthy and Ors. v. State of Tamil Nadu [CRL. O.P. NOS. 3730, 4227, 4095 & 11206 OF 2021 CRL. M.P. NOS. 6647, 6649, 2218, 2601, 2679, 3388, 6708 & 6709 OF 2021 W.P. NO. 1397 OF 2021 AND W.M.P. NO. 5917 OF 2021 dated August 31, 2021]], Ravi Parthasarthy (Petitioner No. 1), Hari […]
In Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI [Cr. M. A. No. 1486/2021 dated August 11, 2021], Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta (the Applicant) has filed the current application seeking an Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C). The Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI (“the Respondent) has contended […]
The Petitioner counsel contested that the Respondent No. 3, in most arbitrary manner and without application of mind, has passed the impugned order dated March 26, 2021 in complete violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
The tax authorities must make a clear distinction between deliberate tax evasion and technical or minor defects which manifest no intention to evade tax. When the IGST liability has been fully discharged, no intention can be attributed on part of the petitioner to evade tax. In the present case, therefore, we would release the machinery upon the petitioner filing an undertaking before this Court that eventually subject to appeal and further right to challenge the order of assessment, if any tax or penalty liability is crystallized, the petitioner would discharge the same.
The Petitioner was alleged of unjustly availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on fake invoices and E-way bills alongside Mr. Amit Kumar (Co-accused). While seeking bail, the Petitioner contended that he has been in custody for a month, as on date, with effect from July 19, 2021 and therefore, his further custodial detention is absolutely not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case.
