Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Calcutta decision in CIT vs. Lakshmangarh Estate & Trading Co Ltd regarding disallowance of cap...
Income Tax : Explore the Calcutta High Court judgment in PCIT Vs Kaushalya Dealers Pvt Ltd under Income Tax Act 1961, focusing on Section 263 j...
Income Tax : ITAT Jaipur rules that AO's non-addition of bogus LTCG does not make the order automatically erroneous. Detailed analysis of Vipul...
Income Tax : Rajasthan HC dismisses Income Tax Dept's appeal, upholds ITAT decision deleting additions on capital gain from share sale. Read th...
Income Tax : MP High Court dismisses the Income Tax Dept's appeal against Gopal Tayal, upholding ITAT's decision on alleged bogus penny stock L...
DCIT Vs Jainam Investments (ITAT MUMBAI) Under this issue the revenue has challenged the deletion of disallowance of Rs.4,71,19,785/- on of sale shares of M/s. Mahavir Advanced Remedies. The Ld. Representative of the revenue has argued that the CIT(A) has wrongly deleted the disallowance of Rs.4,71,19,785/-, therefore, the finding of the CIT(A) is not justifiable, […]
In the instant case, the AO had proceeded predominantly on the basis of the analysis of the financials of M/s Gold Line International Finvest Limited. His conclusion and findings against the Respondent are chiefly on the strength of the astounding 4849.2% jump in share prices of the aforesaid company within a span of two years, which is not supported by the financials.
In the absence of any link between the assessee and the alleged admissions of the directors and brokers, human probability is being used as a vague and convenient medium for the department’s conjectures. No addition can be made on the basis of surmises, suspicion and conjectures. The burden of proving a transaction to be bogus has to be strictly discharged by adducing legal evidences, which would directly prove the fact of bogusness or establish circumstance unerringly and reasonably raising an interference to that effect.
Kalpana Mukesh Ruia Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) As regards the issue of additions on merits for the bogus long-term capital gain (LTCG), we note that the same is based upon the modus operandi of earning bogus long-term capital gain in general mentioned by the assessing officer. It is further more based upon the statements obtained […]
Achal Gupta Vs ITO (ITAT Lucknow) Documents clearly demonstrates that assessee had purchased shares through Brokers for which the payment was made through banking channels. The assessee had sold shares through authorized stock broker and payment was received through baking channels after deduction of STT. On Page 16 which is a copy of Bank account […]
DCIT Vs Ganesh Plantation Ltd. (ITAT Ahmadabad) AO on one hand has recorded his finding with respect to the shares of certain companies that its face value stands at ₹10 but the assessee has purchased the same at a higher value. The basis of arriving at the conclusion that the assessee has purchased the shares […]
Ritin Lakhmani Vs PCIT (ITAT Kolkata) In this case The ld. Pr. CIT has simply cut and pasted para 5 to para 5.12.3 and also para 6 from the orders he had passed u/s 263 of the Act from the order of the Pr. CIT passed u/s 263 of the Act in the case of […]
Dipesh Ramesh Vardhan Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The perusal of record would reveal that the assessee purchased certain shares of an entity namely M/s STL as early as September, 2011. The shares were converted into demat form in assessee’s account during the month of March, 2012. The transactions took place through banking channels. The investments […]
whether addition made by AO u/s 68 as Unaccounted/Unexplained Income by treating the Long Term Capital Gain as Manipulated Transaction is justified in Law?
Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument revolves around the violation of the principle of natural justice. The assessee pleads that: a) The investigation wing report and other documents which is the basis of treating the transaction as bogus by the department […]
