Ruling passed by Authority for Advance Rulings Customs , Central Excise & Service Tax. The Authority for Advance Rulings consists of a Chairman who is a retired Judge of the Supreme court and two members of the rank of Additional Secretary to the Government of India, one each from the Indian Revenue Service and the Indian Legal Service.
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST case laws from July 2024, including SCN issuance, personal hearing rights, appeal delays, and more. Essential...
Goods and Services Tax : Discover if penalties for contract breaches are subject to GST as ruled by AP-AAR. Learn how liquidated damages impact tax liabili...
Goods and Services Tax : 1. INTRODUCTION: ADVANCE RULING MECHANISM IN GST 1.1 The Advance Ruling is issued by tax authorities to companies/firms who reques...
Goods and Services Tax : Gujarat AAR rules nominal deductions from employee salaries for canteen services are not a supply of services, allowing ITC claims...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore critical GST rulings impacting taxpayers: validity of assessment orders, denial of ITC, electronic credit ledger blocking,...
Goods and Services Tax : New functionality to search for GST Advance Ruling Orders issued by Authority / Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling on GST Por...
Goods and Services Tax : Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) constituted under the provisions of a SGST/ UTGST Act, in terms of the provisions of Section 96...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai rules on the classification of Dual Mass Flywheel under Customs Tariff Act, addressing its role in vehicle driveline s...
Custom Duty : CAAR clarifies AC parts classification: SKD imports together as complete units; separate imports as parts under CTH 84159000. Cruc...
Custom Duty : CAAR Mumbai's ruling on Dexolac 2 import, clarifying regional value content and tariff change criteria under ASEAN trade rules....
Goods and Services Tax : The activity of transfer of title of goods stored in FTWZ Unit by applicant to its customers in Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) or mult...
Goods and Services Tax : AAR Tamil Nadu denies rectification request for Mitsubishi Electric's GST ruling, confirming no errors in the original decision on...
Goods and Services Tax : Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Authority makes changes in its lineup, appointing Shri. Ajaykumar Vaman Bonde as a member of Ad...
Goods and Services Tax : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan has been appointed as member of Maharashtra Advance Ruling Authority in the place of Mr. Rajiv Magoo. FINANCE DEP...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Himachal Pradesh, in supersession of this department’s notification of even No. dated 14.09.2020, published in the e...
Goods and Services Tax : Governor of Delhi under Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, is pleased to reconstitute the Delhi Authority for Advance Ruling...
Goods and Services Tax : Shri. Rajiv Magoo, Joint Commissioner of Central Tax has been appointed as member of Maharashtra GST Advance Ruling Committee in t...
In re Anshul Life Sciences (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR rule that pea protein merit classification under subheading 21061000 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF CUSTOMS AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MUMBAI M/s. Anshul Life Sciences, 401, 4th Floor, Jagdamba House, Peru Baug, Goregaon East, Mumbai- 400063 filed an […]
In re Frizwell Agro Foods (CAAR Mumbai) CAAR held that the dehydrated dark and small seedless raisin (Vitis vinifera) merit classification under subheading 08062010 of the first schedule of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and are eligible for exemption benefit allowed under sr. no. 32 of notification no. 50/2017-Cus., dated 30.06.2017. FULL TEXT OF ORDER […]
In re Cinta Medtech Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Cinta Medtech Private Limited, the applicant, […]
AAR hold that Steel Authority of India Ltd., SAIL is a ‘Government Entity’, therefore the tax rate applicable to value of contract (works contract service only) between the Applicant and M/s SAIL is leviable at 12% [CGST @ 6% + SGST 6%]
In re Mody Education Foundation (GST AAR Rajasthan) Whether Hostel Accommodation Charges per Hostel Seat provided by the Mody Education Foundation (MEF) to the students of Mody University of Science and Technology (MUST) having value of service upto Rs. 1000/- per day would be eligible for exemption under entry no. 14 of the Notification No. […]
In re Crown Craft India Private Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) Question 1: Since our present and new unit (situated within the Rajasthan state) would have same GSTIN therefore sending goods/ raw material/ capital goods from one unit to other would not comprise supply of goods or services. In such circumstance would we require to pay GST on […]
In re Gurkripa Career Education Private Limited (GST AAR Rajasthan) Q1. Whether the activity of providing the hostel on the rent to various students by applicant is exempt (where hostel fees charged per student per day is much less than Rs. 1000/-)? Q2. If is it exempt it shall be claimed as exempted under which […]
In re Fire Prevent Systems (GST AAR Karnataka) Applicant is providing training to the trainees on fire prevention, the same is covered under SAC 999293 and is liable to GST at 18% as per Serial No.30 of the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR […]
In re Auriga Research Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Section 95 (c) of the CGST Act 2017 defines ‘Applicant’ as any person registered or desirous of obtaining registration under the said Act. It could be easily inferred from above that any person registered or desirous of obtaining registration under CGST Act 2017 can seek advance […]
In re Royal Carbon Black Private Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) AAAR have also examined the impugned Advance Ruling passed by the MAAR, wherein the MAAR has refrained from passing the advance ruling in the matter citing the reason that the Appellant has not provided the details regarding the chemical composition of the impugned product, i.e., […]
