Case Law Details
Case Name : Gautam Bhattacharya Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Appeal Number : Service Tax Appeal No. 20039 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/03/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Gautam Bhattacharya Vs Commissioner of Central Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
Brief facts of the case are that the appellants are the partners of partnership firm namely M/s. Ernst & Young, LLP. The appellants had filed their income tax returns showing components such as ‘sale of services’, against which partners have shown certain amount received from the partnership firm as their income. The said income tax returns were supplied to the authorities below, who after examining the same raised a query to the appellants, why no
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
THIS TRIBUNAL DECISION IS ONE MORE CLASSICAL EXAMPLE OF HARASSMENT CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT OFFICERS. THE WAS A PARTNER IN A BIG B FIRM AND THEREFORE HAD ALL THE RESOURCES TO CONTEST THE MATTER. AN ORDINARY TAXPAYER WOILD HAVE EOTHER SETTLED THA MATTER WITH BRIBE OR WOULD HAVE FACED EXREME HARASSMENT AND UNBEARABLE LEGAL EXPENSES.