This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Imposition of penalty unsustainable as demand sustained due to mis-interpretation of service
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kitco Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kitco Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax (CESTAT Bangalore)
CESTAT Bangalore held that imposition of penalty unsustainable as service tax is demanded due to mis-interpretation of service being classified as joint venture agreement and not a franchisee service.
Facts- The appellants are registered with the Department for providing various taxable services viz., Consulting Engineering, Market Research Agency, Manpower Recruitment Agency, Management Consultant Service, etc., during the relevant period. Alleging that the appellant had provided ‘Franchisee Service’ during th...
Author Info
