Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Private records recovered during investigation cannot prove charge of clandestine removal of goods

Case Law Details

Case Name
Bhardwaj Steels Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Bhardwaj Steels Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) CESTAT Kolkata held that the charge of clandestine removal of goods cannot be proved on the basis of private records recovered during the course of investigation in the absence of any corroborative evidence in support. Accordingly, order set aside and appeal is allowed. Facts- The appellants are engaged in the business of manufacturer of M. S.Rod and other related products falling under Chapter 72 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Post search operations, demand-cum-show cause notice w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *