Case Law Details
Case Name : Directi Internet Solutions Pvt Ltd Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Appeal No.ST/491/12
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/08/2014
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Accreditation by ICANN cannot be treated as representing ICANN and ICANN accredited registries cannot be treated as franchisee of ICANN.
Appellant is engaged in the activity of registration of website domain names i.e. appellant is a registrar. The appellant is also accredited by International Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) for certain top level domains. The appellant is registering domain names permitted by ICANN and ICANN accredited registries. The appellant is paying fee as p
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Hi,
We are domain & hosting reseller proprietorship firm.
Now our provider “Directi Web Technology Pvt. Ltd. which is an Indian entity” will start charging Service Tax of 15% to us.
And we are already charging 15% Service Tax from our client.
Can we get any relaxation or reverse charge benefit from Government?
Regards,
Vibhukant