Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M S Thanigaive Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M S Thanigaive Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) One Last Chance—With Cost: ITAT Sets Aside Ex-parte Reassessments, Remands 6 Years to AO for De-novo Orders The Chennai ITAT has condoned a delay of 284 days and set aside ex-parte reassessment orders u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 for AYs 2012-13 to 2017-18, granting the Assessee one final opportunity to contest the additions on merits. The Assessee, engaged in real estate & film production, had not filed returns for the impugned years and did not respond to reassessment notices. The AO consequently framed ex-parte orders, making additions towards unexplained ba...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930