This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Vivad-Se-Vishwas Didn’t Mature — Appeal Can’t Die by Assumption
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sundararajan Raghunathan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sundararajan Raghunathan Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Vivad-Se-Vishwas Didn’t Mature — Appeal Can’t Die by Assumption
The ITAT Chennai condoned a 168-day delay and set aside the CIT(A)’s order which had dismissed the appeal as “withdrawn” merely because the assessee had opted for Vivad-Se-Vishwas, 2020.
The assessee had filed Form-3 under the Scheme, which the CIT(A) himself acknowledged, but the assessee could not make payment by 31.03.2021 due to financial distress. Consequently, the dispute was never settled under the Scheme. Despite this, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without adjudi...
Author Info
